A human being that eats human flesh; hence, any that devours its own kind., Relating to cannibals or cannibalism.
No, eating an ape would not be considered cannibalism. Cannibalism refers specifically to the act of consuming individuals of one's own species. Since humans and apes are different species, consuming an ape does not fall under the definition of cannibalism.
The correct spelling is cannibalism (eating humans, or the same species).
no because cannibalism refers only to the eating of human flesh. since angels are not human therefore if baby Jesus eats an angel, it will not be considered as cannibalism. other definition of cannibalism is the eating of the flesh of the same kind. If baby Jesus was born to be human as the bible states, then eating of angels does not make him a cannibal.
No. Cannibalism is illegal everywhere.No it is not legal anywhere in the world.
Cannibalism should be illegal.
Yes! the definition of a cannibal is someone or something that eats its own kind
Intrauterine Cannibalism was created in 1999.
Cannibalism - album - was created in 1978.
Yes, it would be considered cannibalism if a zombie eats a human, as the term refers to one individual of a species consuming another individual of the same species. In this case, both zombies and humans are classified as members of the species Homo sapiens, despite the zombies being in a reanimated state. Therefore, the act of a zombie consuming a human fits the definition of cannibalism.
Yes, in the famine of 1201 the Egyptians resorted to cannibalism.
The very thought of the natives' cannibalism is eating me alive...
Cannibalism was never and never will be introduced in USA.