Want this question answered?
epoque
There are different definitions of barbarian. One of these is a person who is regarded as culturally inferior; according to this definition, a Roman or Greek might have considered Charlemagne a barbarian. Another definition is a fierce or cruel person; by that definition, different people would give different answers, depending on how they interpret his actions. Another definition is an uncultured person; by that definition, Charlemagne was not a barbarian at all, as he was a great patron of arts and education.
levitt?
An interruption or break.
A 'trying experience'.
A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.A square number, by definition, cannot be a prime so the answer is there are no such numbers.
Yes, by definition.
What is a prime definition
Look at the definition of a prime number. A prime number has no factors, other than 1, or itself.Look at the definition of a prime number. A prime number has no factors, other than 1, or itself.Look at the definition of a prime number. A prime number has no factors, other than 1, or itself.Look at the definition of a prime number. A prime number has no factors, other than 1, or itself.
1 was considered as a prime but now the definition changed. Now the definition was that a prime is divisible only by 1 and itself
No. By definition prime number has to be a positive integer.
Yes, by definition.
No. By definition, the product has a proper factor - the prime.
102,068,001 = 3 x 3,4022,667But definition it is not a prime number.
It means first.
You cannot. By definition, a composite number is not prime and you cannot make it prime.
The definition of a prime number is: A number that has no factors other than '1' and itself. But 35 has factors of 5 and 7. So by definition, it's not a prime.