misconduct
Yes, it can be if it rises to the level of criminal intent or tortious conduct (i.e.: libel or slander) on the part of the defamer.
The term tortious is pronounced (TOR-shuss) and means legally wrongful.
Dignified in conduct or appearance.
Slander itself is a separate legal claim from tortious interference. However, if the slander is used to interfere with a person's business relationship or contractual agreement, it could potentially be considered as tortious interference. It would depend on the specific circumstances of the case.
A tort is a civil wrong. Tortious liability would be liability for a civil wrong. For example, if a person caused an automobile accident, the person would would be liable in "tort," or would have "tortious liability," for the harm proximately resulting from the wrongful act. Bozarts
A nonconductor doesn't conduct electricity or heat.
The word is spelled tortious. It refers to acts that fall under tort law. In a sentence... Principals are liable for the tortious acts of their agents.
None of the statements contained in the question are correct. Torts are civil wrongs, as opposed to criminal offenses.
A cord to conduct power to an electrical appliance.
A tortfeasor A tortfeasor
No. Insulators by definition don't conduct electricity.
c) criminal liability