misconduct
Yes, it can be if it rises to the level of criminal intent or tortious conduct (i.e.: libel or slander) on the part of the defamer.
The term tortious is pronounced (TOR-shuss) and means legally wrongful.
Dignified in conduct or appearance.
Slander itself is a separate legal claim from tortious interference. However, if the slander is used to interfere with a person's business relationship or contractual agreement, it could potentially be considered as tortious interference. It would depend on the specific circumstances of the case.
A tort is a civil wrong. Tortious liability would be liability for a civil wrong. For example, if a person caused an automobile accident, the person would would be liable in "tort," or would have "tortious liability," for the harm proximately resulting from the wrongful act. Bozarts
The word is spelled tortious. It refers to acts that fall under tort law. In a sentence... Principals are liable for the tortious acts of their agents.
None of the statements contained in the question are correct. Torts are civil wrongs, as opposed to criminal offenses.
A nonconductor doesn't conduct electricity or heat.
A cord to conduct power to an electrical appliance.
A tortfeasor A tortfeasor
No. Insulators by definition don't conduct electricity.
c) criminal liability