answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

The derived class derives, or inherits, from the base class. The derived class is like a "child", and the base class, the "parent". The child class has the attributes of the parent class - its variables (those defined at the class level) and methods. Changes done to the parent class (the base class) will affect the child class (the derived class).

User Avatar

Wiki User

13y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

A base class is a class from which the least-derived class inherits directly and from which the most-derived class inherits indirectly from the least-derived class. A virtual base class is a class from which the most-derived class inherits directly while the least-derived class inherits directly but virtually via the most-derived class.

Example of non-virtual base class declaration

class base{};

class least_derived : public base{};

class most_derived : public least_derived{};

Here, the most_derived class inherits the baseclass, indirectly, via the least_derived class, which inherits base class directly.

Example of virtual base class declaration

class base{};

class least_derived : virtual public base{};

class most_derived : public least_derived{};

Here, the most_derived class inherits the baseclass directly, while least_derived class inherits base class virtually (via the most_derived class). If there is no most_derived class, the least_derivedclass will inherit base class directly (just as if it were non-virtual).

In single inheritance, such as shown above, there is very little difference in terms of behaviour. Virtual base classes become far more useful when used with multiple inheritance.

Example of non-virtual base class declaration in multiple inheritance

class base{};

class least_derived_1 : public base{};

class least_derived_2 : public base{};

class most_derived : public least_derived_1, public least_derived_2 {};

Here, most_derived inherits two instances of baseclass, indirectly, one from least_derived_1 and the other from least_derived_2. This introduces an ambiguity when referring implicitly to the base class, meaning you must access the appropriate base class explicitly. E.g., most_derived.least_derived1::base or most_derived.least_derived2::base.

Example of virtual base class declaration in multiple inheritance

class base{};

class least_derived_1 : virtual public base{};

class least_derived_2 : virtual public base{};

class most_derived : public least_derived_1, public least_derived_2 {};

Here, most_derived inherits just one instance of base class, directly, while least_derived_1 and least_derived_2 share that same instance, virtually. This removes all ambiguity and allows you to access the baseclass implicitly from the most_derived class. E.g., most_derived::base.

Note that not all base classes can be inherited virtually. Ideally, the base class should have few member variables (preferably none at all), and should be an abstract base class (a class with at least one pure-virtual method). Since all derivatives effectively share the same instance of the base class, this not only removes all ambiguity, but also reduces the memory footprint of the most-derived class.

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Difference between base class and derived class?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Continue Learning about Engineering

Does the derived class take the memory of base class in inheritance?

Yes, the derived class includes the memory of the base class. The derived class inherits everything in the base class, data and function, and provides additional data and function as needed.


What is the difference between the direct and indirect base class?

Direct base classes are those that are specified in a derived class' inheritance declaration. Indirect base classes are those that are inherited via the direct base classes. class A{}; class B : public A{}; class C : public B{}; With respect to C, B is direct while A is indirect. With respect to B, A is direct.


What is multilevel inheritance in C plus plus?

Multi-level inheritance involves at least 3 classes, a, b and c, such that a is derived from b, and b is derived from c. c is therefore the least-derived base class, b is an intermediate base class and a is the most-derived class.


Is it true that a derived class inherits all the members of its base class?

False. A derived class inherits the public and protected members of its base class. Private members of the base class cannot be inherited.


How you can override base class member in derived classexplain with example?

To override a base class method you simply need to declare the base class method as being virtual. As well as creating a v-table, this also gives a visual hint to other developers that you expect the function to be overridden. The v-table ensures that all calls to the base class method are routed to the derived class method, thus ensuring objects behave polymorphically, according to their actual type, and not what we're actually pointing at. Consider the following example: #include <iostream> class base { public: virtual ~base(); virtual void PrintMe() const { std::cout << "I am a base class!" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: void PrintMe() const { std::cout << "I am a derived class!" << std::endl; } }; int main() { base b; derived d; base* pb = &d; b.PrintMe(); d.PrintMe(); pb->PrintMe(); return( 0 ); } Output: I am a base class! I am a derived class! I am a derived class! Note that although pb points to the base class instance of d, it still knows that it really is a derived class, as can be seen from the third line of output. Now try removing the virtual keyword from the base class method. The output will change as follows: Output: I am a base class! I am a derived class! I am a base class! Now your derived class thinks it is a base class. This is because the v-table no longer has no entry for that method, and therefore the call cannot be routed to the overridden derived class method. The base class method is called because that's what we're actually pointing at and the object no longer behaves polymorphically according to its actual type. Note also that if any method is declared virtual in a class, the class constructor must also be declared virtual. If you fail to do this, your classes will not be destroyed properly. The virtual keyword ensures that the most-derived class is always destroyed first, before working up the hierarchy of destructors to eventually destroy the least-derived class, the base class itself. Consider the following example without a virtual destructor: #include <iostream> class base { public: base(){ std::cout << "Base class created" << std::endl; } ~base(){ std::cout << "Base class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class created" << std::endl; } ~derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; int main() { derived* d = new derived(); base* b = d; delete( b ); return( 0 ); } Output: Base class created Derived class created Base class destroyed As you can see, the derived class was created but was not destroyed. We've created a memory leak: that memory cannot be recovered until the program ends. Now add the virtual keyword to the base class destructor: #include <iostream> class base { public: base(){ std::cout << "Base class created" << std::endl; } virtual ~base(){ std::cout << "Base class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class created" << std::endl; } ~derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; int main() { derived* d = new derived(); base* b = d; delete( b ); return( 0 ); } Output: Base class created Derived class created Derived class destroyed Base class destroyed Now we have the expected behaviour and have resolved the memory leak. Remember, if ANY method of a class is declared virtual, the destructor must also be declared virtual. Note that although derived classes need not use the virtual keyword in front of overrides (it is implied by the base class), there is no harm in explicitly declaring them as such, if only to give a visual hint that the methods are expected to be overridden by derivatives of the derivative (multi-level inheritance).

Related questions

What is the Difference between multilevel and multiple inheritance?

Multiple Inheritance : we can inherit more than one class in the same class. Multi-Level Inheritance: where one class can inherit only one base class and the derived class can become base class of some other class.


Does the derived class take the memory of base class in inheritance?

Yes, the derived class includes the memory of the base class. The derived class inherits everything in the base class, data and function, and provides additional data and function as needed.


What is the difference between the direct and indirect base class?

Direct base classes are those that are specified in a derived class' inheritance declaration. Indirect base classes are those that are inherited via the direct base classes. class A{}; class B : public A{}; class C : public B{}; With respect to C, B is direct while A is indirect. With respect to B, A is direct.


What is multilevel inheritance in C plus plus?

Multi-level inheritance involves at least 3 classes, a, b and c, such that a is derived from b, and b is derived from c. c is therefore the least-derived base class, b is an intermediate base class and a is the most-derived class.


Is it true that a derived class inherits all the members of its base class?

False. A derived class inherits the public and protected members of its base class. Private members of the base class cannot be inherited.


How you can override base class member in derived classexplain with example?

To override a base class method you simply need to declare the base class method as being virtual. As well as creating a v-table, this also gives a visual hint to other developers that you expect the function to be overridden. The v-table ensures that all calls to the base class method are routed to the derived class method, thus ensuring objects behave polymorphically, according to their actual type, and not what we're actually pointing at. Consider the following example: #include <iostream> class base { public: virtual ~base(); virtual void PrintMe() const { std::cout << "I am a base class!" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: void PrintMe() const { std::cout << "I am a derived class!" << std::endl; } }; int main() { base b; derived d; base* pb = &d; b.PrintMe(); d.PrintMe(); pb->PrintMe(); return( 0 ); } Output: I am a base class! I am a derived class! I am a derived class! Note that although pb points to the base class instance of d, it still knows that it really is a derived class, as can be seen from the third line of output. Now try removing the virtual keyword from the base class method. The output will change as follows: Output: I am a base class! I am a derived class! I am a base class! Now your derived class thinks it is a base class. This is because the v-table no longer has no entry for that method, and therefore the call cannot be routed to the overridden derived class method. The base class method is called because that's what we're actually pointing at and the object no longer behaves polymorphically according to its actual type. Note also that if any method is declared virtual in a class, the class constructor must also be declared virtual. If you fail to do this, your classes will not be destroyed properly. The virtual keyword ensures that the most-derived class is always destroyed first, before working up the hierarchy of destructors to eventually destroy the least-derived class, the base class itself. Consider the following example without a virtual destructor: #include <iostream> class base { public: base(){ std::cout << "Base class created" << std::endl; } ~base(){ std::cout << "Base class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class created" << std::endl; } ~derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; int main() { derived* d = new derived(); base* b = d; delete( b ); return( 0 ); } Output: Base class created Derived class created Base class destroyed As you can see, the derived class was created but was not destroyed. We've created a memory leak: that memory cannot be recovered until the program ends. Now add the virtual keyword to the base class destructor: #include <iostream> class base { public: base(){ std::cout << "Base class created" << std::endl; } virtual ~base(){ std::cout << "Base class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; class derived: public base { public: derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class created" << std::endl; } ~derived(){ std::cout << "Derived class destroyed" << std::endl; } }; int main() { derived* d = new derived(); base* b = d; delete( b ); return( 0 ); } Output: Base class created Derived class created Derived class destroyed Base class destroyed Now we have the expected behaviour and have resolved the memory leak. Remember, if ANY method of a class is declared virtual, the destructor must also be declared virtual. Note that although derived classes need not use the virtual keyword in front of overrides (it is implied by the base class), there is no harm in explicitly declaring them as such, if only to give a visual hint that the methods are expected to be overridden by derivatives of the derivative (multi-level inheritance).


How do you call base class method using derived class object?

If the base class method is non-private, the derived class can call the base class method implicitly. However, if the derived class overrides or overloads the method, the base class method must be called explicitly. The following demonstrates explicit calls to base class methods: #include <iostream> using namespace std; class Base { public: Base(){} void Foo(){ cout << "Base::Foo" << endl; } }; class Derived : public Base { public: Derived(){} void Foo(){ cout << "Derived::Foo" << endl; Base::Foo(); } }; int main() { Derived derived; derived.Foo(); derived.Base::Foo(); // Explicit call to base class method. return(0); } Output: Derived::Foo Base::Foo Base::Foo


What do you mean by protected derivation of a sub class from base class?

When you derive a class (the sub-class) from a base class using protected access, all public members of the base class become protected members of the derived class, while protected members of the base class will remain protected. Private members are never inherited so they remain private to the base class. By contrast, if you use public inheritance, the public members of the base class remain public to the derived class, while protected members of the base class remain protected in the derived class. If you use private inheritance, both the public and protected members of the base class become private to the derived class. Note that accessibility cannot be increased, only reduced or left the same. That is, a protected member of a base class cannot be inherited as a public member of a derived class -- it can only be declared private or remain protected. Note also that accessibility is viewed from outside of the derived class. That is, all members of a base class other than the private members are inherited by the derived class and are therefore fully accessible to the derived class. But from outside of the derived class, all base class accessibility is determined by the access specified by the type of inheritance.


Can a derived class make a public base function private true or false?

True. A derived class can make a public base function private. The derived function is private, within the derived class, but public in other contexts.


Which base class member functions are not inherited by a derived class?

Derived classes only inherit the protected and public members of their base classes. Private member functions cannot be inherited by a derived class.


When the concept of method overriding is necessary?

concept of overriding is very important as due to overriding the derived class can use the function of the base class! when the function has same name and prototype in both the classes(base and derived) then the derived class can use the funtion of base class!


What are Public and Private inheritance in c plus plus?

Public, protected and private inheritance determine how the public and protected base class members are inherited by the derived class. Private members are never inherited and are therefore unaffected by the type of inheritance (they remain private to the base class). The following table summarises how inheritance affects accessibility of base class members with respect to the derived class: public inheritanceprotected inheritanceprivate inheritancepublic member of base classpublic member of derived classprotected member of derived classprivate member of derived classprotected member of base classprotected member of derived classprotected member of derived classprivate member of derived classprivate member of base classprivate member of base classprivate member of base classprivate member of base class Note that accessibility to individual public and protected base class members can be overridden within the derived class, regardless of the type of inheritance specified.