Radioactive substances are unstable as a result of the extra neutrons present in the nuclei of the substance.
Non-radioactive substances are stable.
Radioactive minerals are unstable and emit radiation at a constant rate. They also have half lives and lose energy overtime. Nonradioactive minerals are stable, and by there own are incapable of emitting energy.
There is no difference
Biusoee
The difference between the freezing and boiling points vary from substance to substance.
Radioactive materials contain unstable atoms that decay and emit radiation, while non-radioactive materials do not emit radiation. Radioactive materials can be harmful to living organisms due to their ionizing radiation, whereas non-radioactive materials are generally considered safe for everyday use.
The average time needed for half of the nuclei in a sample of a radioactive substance to undergo radioactive decay is called the "half-life." This period is a characteristic property of each radioactive isotope and varies significantly between different substances. During one half-life, the quantity of the radioactive material reduces to half of its original amount.
Chemists prefer the expression pure substance.
The difference between a homogeneous mixture and a pure substance is that a pure substance has a fixed composition and cannot be separated because it is chemically bonded and a homogeneous mixture can be separated.
i think it is homeostasis
No.
are radioactive and the actinides are not
In substance, there is no difference. It is just a matter of style.