0
what is the difference between an assembler and the translator
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the Difference between assembler and macro?
I am not sure about the answer but think so, Assembler: Its a program that converts a low level language into machine code, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions Macro- Assembler: It performs the same task as does the assembler but there is some times a one-to-many correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions. Please discuss further...
Is C programming works without assembler compiler interpreter?
No, a C program cant work without an interpreter or compiler or assembler as the code written in the program is not understood directly by the computer so it needs any of the above translator program to make the program understandable to the computer.-Shruti Jain
What are the differences between a compiler and a translator?
A compiler transforms source code from a source file into low-level machine code, which is able to be executed directly on the CPU. A translator feeds the source code of a script into a different program that determines what the code is doing and executes the instructions.
What is difference between assembler and linker?
There is no definite term "assembler" in compilation process. It is more like "compiler" and "linker". Assembler usually refers to a compiler of machine language: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_language So you probably mean difference between compiler and linker? Lets say you have a 3 module program, and it uses a 3rd party library, then the compiler will just compile each of your modules (separately) into binary pieces, which have "unclosed" references to abovementioned library and other 2 modules. After u have 3 binary pieces comes in "linker" it attaches those "unclosed" (or unlinked) links to other modules and library, therefore giving you working program file (.exe file for example). Really hard to say that without a schema or something like that:) Hope this answer helped you.
What is a low-level language?
A low-level language is any symbolic computer programming language that has a low-level of abstraction between the language itself and the machine code that it produces. Assembler language has a near 1:1 relationship with its resultant machine code and is therefore a low-level language. In fact, the only things lower than assembler language is machine code itself and disassembly, which is the reverse of assembly, both of which have no abstraction whatsoever. The only real difference between assembler language and disassembly are that disassembly has none of the comments and none of the symbolic references used by the original assembler, since both were stripped out during assembly. However, a competent hacker, with the aid of the disassembler, can reconstruct a facsimile of the original assembler from the machine code disassembly, thus permitting software to be reverse-engineered.
What is the Difference between cross assembler and resident assembler?
An assembler which runs on a computer for which it produces object codes
The three Types of translator?
Assembler, Compiler and Interpretor
What is the difference between computer interpreter assembler?
wee2
What are translator in c language?
The assembler is translator which converts assembly language code into machine language code.
What is the difference between a translator and an interpreter?
A translator is written translation. And an interpreter is an oral translation.
What are the difference between ms-dos and unix as a language translator?
Neither one of them is a "language translator."
What is the name of the translator used by Assembly Language?
Assembly language does not use a traditional translator; instead, it uses an assembler to convert its mnemonics into machine code. The assembler translates the assembly instructions into binary code that the computer's CPU can understand and execute.
What is the Difference between assembler and macro?
I am not sure about the answer but think so, Assembler: Its a program that converts a low level language into machine code, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions Macro- Assembler: It performs the same task as does the assembler but there is some times a one-to-many correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions. Please discuss further...
What's the difference between interpreter and translator?
Well , in computer terminology an interpreter is a translator which translates a source code line by line and executes it, while a translator is a big word it may have different types like compiler, interpreter, assembler etc. Answer In more specific language terms, an interpreter is a person who translates one language to another, for instance at the UN, where quick-wittedness and a good memory are attributes, whereas a translator converts a written work from from one language to another, where being methodical and having good research material to hand are advantages.
What converts mnemonics to machine level languages?
Assembler However, because the computer does not understand mnemonics, we utilise Assembler to convert them into machine language. Assembler is a machine code translator that accepts assembly code as input and outputs machine code. To learn more about data science please visit- Learnbay.co
Is C programming works without assembler compiler interpreter?
No, a C program cant work without an interpreter or compiler or assembler as the code written in the program is not understood directly by the computer so it needs any of the above translator program to make the program understandable to the computer.-Shruti Jain
What is the difference between interpreter and translator?
An interpreter translates spoken language in real time, facilitating communication between individuals who do not speak the same language, while a translator converts written text from one language to another, preserving the original meaning and nuances of the content. Additionally, interpreters usually work with verbal communication, whereas translators work with written communication.
