wee2
An assembler which runs on a computer for which it produces object codes
what is the difference between an assembler and the translator
A translator is written translation. And an interpreter is an oral translation.
Well , in computer terminology an interpreter is a translator which translates a source code line by line and executes it, while a translator is a big word it may have different types like compiler, interpreter, assembler etc. Answer In more specific language terms, an interpreter is a person who translates one language to another, for instance at the UN, where quick-wittedness and a good memory are attributes, whereas a translator converts a written work from from one language to another, where being methodical and having good research material to hand are advantages.
in my personal point of view i would say a parser is more like "one-directional" "automatic" vs. an interpreter, the interpreter has more "intelligence"
I am not sure about the answer but think so, Assembler: Its a program that converts a low level language into machine code, and there is a one-to-one correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions Macro- Assembler: It performs the same task as does the assembler but there is some times a one-to-many correspondence between the source language statements and machine instructions. Please discuss further...
fftaysuihi7y78yndh
Both are use to convert high level languages into machine language
To find answers to the following questions, visit http://www.soniamelnikova.com: What is a certified translator or interpreter? What is certified translation? What is the difference between translation and interpreting? What is a court interpreter? What is the difference between a registered and a certified court interpreter? Is special training recommended to become a court interpreter? What is ATA Certification? Also, visit: www.lingotip.com www.proz.com www.atanet.org
the answer is that no body knows what it is including me so crack it man.:P
A strict interpreter must change every word from the speakers language to the listeners language. A loose interpreter has more liberty to relay the message in the most efficient way without concern of every word.
computer does not have feelings The main difference is that a computer can't think.