moral diplomacy
arbitration negotiation mediation
this question has not yet been answered
You try to reach an agreement in a negotiation whereas you communicate information in a dialogue.
The major difference between voluntary arbitration and compulsory arbitration lies in the parties' consent. In voluntary arbitration, both parties agree to submit their dispute to an arbitrator, making it a consensual process. In contrast, compulsory arbitration occurs when a law or a contract mandates arbitration, requiring the parties to resolve their disputes through this method regardless of their willingness. This distinction affects the level of control and choice each party has over the arbitration process.
Peace arbitration is a formal process where a neutral third party resolves disputes between conflicting parties by making binding decisions, often based on legal principles. In contrast, peace negotiation involves direct dialogue between conflicting parties aimed at reaching a mutually acceptable agreement, typically without binding authority from a third party. Both processes seek to address underlying issues and foster reconciliation, but they differ in their approach and authority. Arbitration emphasizes resolution through imposed solutions, while negotiation focuses on collaborative problem-solving.
No difference, 2 different words for the same thing.
The arbitration panel listens to both sides of a dispute. They encourage discussion and negotiation between the two disputing parties, but if the two parties do not come to a conclusion the panel will make the final decision in the case.
Edward Levin has written: 'Levin's laws' -- subject(s): Negotiation 'I Will Be Sanctified' 'Witnesses in arbitration' -- subject(s): Industrial Arbitration, Witnesses
Moral Diplomacy
Moral Diplomacy. :]
The League of Nations.