Want this question answered?
Nothing but the terminology. "Atomic" was the term used in the early days of nuclear weapons and nuclear power. "Nuclear" (describing the fission process of nuclear power and nuclear weapons) became the term when fusion bombs became reality, as Atomic can refer to both fission and fusion processes.
There isn't much difference in these terms. Both refer to nuclear weapons, and they are general terms that can pretty much be used interchangeably.
The difference between atomic fission and atomic nuclear is that they both have something to do with atomic and war. Hope this helps I am kind of in a rush......Smile!
This is a war fought using Atomic weapons. Atomic weapons are weapons that use Nuclear fission explostion producing tremendous pressure and radiation. Later nuclear weapons were called hydrogen bombs that use nuclear fussion.
none. the terms atomic and nuclear here are interchangeable, both refer to energy from the atomic nucleus.
Those are two different names for the same thing.There actually is not a difference in the atomic bomb and nuclear bomb. Saying 'Nuclear Bomb' is a modern way of saying 'Atomic Bomb'.
Nuclear reactions in a nuclear reactor are controlled reactions. The reactions in the atomic bomb are not controlled reactions
no
Plutonium for nuclear weapons is obtained in special nuclear reactors for plutonium-239.
There is none.
Yes, nuclear weapons can be scrapped. The radioactive materials can be used in nuclear power plants.
ATOMIC WAR is a war that have nuclear and atomic devices used in a form of warfare. atomic war can become catastrophic for the amounts of radiation remaing from the nuclear weapons.