publishers date is when the work was first printed... copyright date is when the work was first copyrigted... i don't believe they are different to often but I could be wrong... copyright dates usually have the the copyright symbol next to them (that little c in the circle) so you can tell them apart
Not necessarily. Publication is not required for a work to be eligible for copyright protection. An author, or publisher for that matter, can register a copyright to protect a work and subsequently publish it at a later date.
Not necessarily. Publication is not required for a work to be eligible for copyright protection. An author, or publisher for that matter, can register a copyright to protect a work and subsequently publish it at a later date.
It just means there was an additional printing in a different year.
No it's not the date it was made i was wondering that too.
no, they are different
The copyright date is the year the text was completed. It may or may not be the same as the publication date.
No, a copyright date is the first date of publication and an imprint date can be many years later, e.g., a later edition based upon the original copyright date.
Not always. A popular book may come out in many editions over many years, but the copyright date stays the same.
The "facts of publication" are details that we include in bibliographies and footnotes in a research paper or book. When you cite a book, the facts of publication that you need to give are:authortitle and subtitleplace of publication (city)name of publisheryear of publication (not the same as copyright date)page numbersExample from a footnote:Huston Smith, The Illustrated World Religions: A Guide to Our Wisdom Traditions (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 1994), pp. 25-26.If the source is a periodical (magazine or journal), you give the title of the magazine, the volume number, issue number, date, and page numbers:
Not necessarily. The release date can be well after the copyright date.
Any creative work of art, photography or literature on a book cover is protected by the same copyright as the rest of the book. If the copyright has expired, i.e., 95 years after publication, then the cover also becomes public domain. Until then, no, the creative content of the cover is not public domain.
The more famous book, by Rabindranath Tagore, was published in 1913. There is a Bengali book of the same name published in 1910.
From what I remember reading once, there was a period of time in the early 1900's when the copyright date was not required to be listed in books. I'm trying to find more information about that, but I'm having a hard time finding anything.
The title page generally includes the title, the author's name, the publisher, and sometimes the city it was published in. The copyright page includes the same, plus a detailed copyright notification, the catalog-in-publication data from the national library of the country in which it was published, notes on the printing or edition, and other legal boilerplate.
Copyright terms in India are virtually the same as in the US and Europe. For works including literary, dramatic, musical, and non-photograph artistic material the term is life of the author + 60 years. For photographs the term extends 60 years past 1st date of publication.
Same as copyright notice for anything else: Copyright, or copr. or circle-C, the date of copyright and the author or other copyright owner's name. E.g., "Copyright 2012 Walt Disney Productions, Inc."
No they perform different functions. A watermark is designed to identify a photo as a particular artists work or to make illegal duplication difficult. A copyright notice consists of three elements... 1. the © symbol (in some cases (c) is substituted), the word "Copyright" or abbreviation "Copr."; 2. the first year of publication; and 3. the owner of the copyright, either by name, abbreviation, or other designation. A copyright notice is designed to identify the rights holder, date of creation, and the fact that it is copyright protected