The difference is that a heterosexual is only sexually attracted to a person of the opposite sex, while a bisexual is sexually attracted to both men and women.
Your sexuality has nothing to do with your hormone/testosterone level.
Bisexual as mango is.
Bisexual
Not Dioecious nor Monoecious. It comes under another category Monocliny !
answer difference between ontogeny and phylogeny?
They aren't. This is absurd. Points to consider:There is no such thing as a "heterosexual man with bisexual tendencies." You are actually describing a bisexual man, not a heterosexual man. Heterosexual men, by definition, are heterosexual only.Not all bisexual men are interested in being submissive, and not all prefer a certain physical type. All bisexual men are different.
No, he is heterosexual.
None. There are no signs. Also, consider these points:There is no such thing as "bisexual tendencies." A person is either bisexual or they are not bisexual.A heterosexual man cannot be bisexual (by definition of "heterosexual").The ACLU doesn't care about a person's sexual orientation.
There is only one difference: heterosexual relationships are between members of the opposite sex, and homosexual relationships are between members of the same sex.
Yes, of course.
When referring to a straight girl you mean that she is heterosexual. If she is not heterosexual she may be considered homosexual or bisexual.
If he likes men, he is homosexual. If he likes woman, he is heterosexual, if he likes both, he is bisexual.
Most human beings are heterosexual.
no way
No evidence of him being anything but heterosexual.
There is no correlation between same-sex sexual activity and being a subservient heterosexual housewife.
No bio lists any orientation but heterosexual.