Humanistic theorist believe that we are individuals who choose our reactions and behaviors. They believe things like childhood do not influence a being and that a life can not be predicted. For instance the family and life I grew up in do not cause me to rob a bank, I make the choice to rob a bank.
Reductionist believe that laws undermine our behavior and predict what we do.This basically translated into a cause and effect relationship. For instance if I stand out in below freezing weather in a speedo, then the weather will cause me t become frostbite.
ano nga ba ang difference ng humanistic at godly economics? help aman Jan dhen_07
what is the difference between an auction and a tender
what is the difference between approval and endorsement
what is the difference between qualitative and quantitative
Difference between interest and mark up
ano nga ba ang difference ng humanistic at godly economics? help aman Jan dhen_07
In the middle ages, the idea of being humanistic was to be faithful to scripture. The contemporary association with being humanistic is to comply with a degree of charity and behavior that is expected of social norms.
Birds have an evolutionary link between Dinosaurs...
There is no natural selection and therefore no evolutionary need for a difference between genders.
evolutionary forces is most likely to decrease variation between populations
Cladistics is a method of analyzing the evolutionary relationships between groups to construct their family tree.
i don't know and i don't care! actually i do care :)
The reaction between magnesium oxide and carbon at 2000C to form magnesium metal and carbon monoxide is an example of the reduction of magnesium oxide to magnesium metal.
The genetic difference between an aborigine and an African lies in their distinct ancestral origins and evolutionary histories. Aborigines are indigenous to Australia and have genetic markers that trace back to early migration patterns in the region, whereas Africans have genetic diversity that is linked to their long evolutionary history on the continent. These differences are reflected in variations in gene frequencies, haplotypes, and genetic admixture patterns between the two populations.
Take the protein cytochrome C. There is not one amino acid difference in structure between we humans and our close relatives, the chimpanzees. There are 51 differences between humans and single celled yeast in amino acids. We can strongly and simply infer from this data the evolutionary relationship among the three species mentioned here.
Linnaeus classification is based on physical and observable characteristics of organisms, categorizing them into hierarchical groups like kingdoms and species. Phylogenetic classification, on the other hand, is based on evolutionary relationships and genetic similarities among organisms, organizing them into groups that reflect their evolutionary history. Phylogenetic classification provides a more accurate depiction of the evolutionary relatedness between different species compared to Linnaeus classification.
Cladistics would argue that humans share a more recent common ancestor with apes than with monkeys based on shared derived characteristics, while evolutionary taxonomists might classify humans, apes, and monkeys separately in a hierarchical classification scheme based on their evolutionary relationships. Both approaches would emphasize the complexity of evolutionary history and the importance of examining shared traits to infer relationships.