0
Want this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is the difference between elicited acts and commanded acts?
An elicited act is one which arises out of persuasion or request and is voluntary whilst a commanded act is one done out of obedience and may may not be voluntary.
What is the difference between intrapsychic and interpsychic?
difference between interpsychic and intrapsychic
How is obedience defined?
Obedience is the immediate performance of an activity commanded by someone in authority.
What is the difference between hurt and harm?
there is no difference
What is the difference between observation infferrence and prediction?
Difference between observation, inference ,and prediction
What is the difference between amicable and conciliation?
'Amicable' is an adjective. 'Conciliation' is a noun. Amicable means 'friendly.' 'Conciliation' is "the act of makingfriendly."
What is the difference between respect and obedience?
There is a big difference between respect and obedience. Obedience means that a person follows the orders given to them, often out of fear. Respect means that a person is willing to follow orders because they care about the person giving them, and they want to be helpful and reciprocate that good energy.
Is advocacy the same as conciliation?
No, advocacy and conciliation are different concepts. Advocacy involves actively supporting a particular cause or idea, while conciliation involves mediating between parties to help them reach agreement or resolve a dispute. Advocacy aims to promote a specific viewpoint, whereas conciliation aims to facilitate communication and understanding between conflicting parties.
When a dispute is referred to a council is it an arbitration or a conciliation?
conciliation
What is conciliation in workers comp?
In a workers compensation case a conciliation is a meeting between the employee, the employee's attorney, the employer and a conciliator from the Department of Labor. It is an informal meeting during which there will be an attempt to reach an agreement between all parties.Ê
What is bank conciliation?
Bank conciliation is when a bank receives money
What is the difference between a developing nation and a developed nation?
it's either: -civil obedience - religion -industry or -strikes The answer is industry
What types of conciliation methods are available?
The types of conciliation methods available are Meditation, Conciliation, Arbitration and counseling. Conciliation is apparently like counseling but is run by the government and people are referred by their employers.
What is the difference between advocacy and mediation?
To me, a mediator, one who does the mediation, seeks to bring conciliation and reconciliation to both sides and a advocate, one who brings advocacy, represents the plaintiff in one side of the argument.
What is the main difference between developing nations and a developed nation?
it's either: -civil obedience - religion -industry or -strikes The answer is industry
What is the main difference between a developing nation and a developed nation?
it's either: -civil obedience - religion -industry or -strikes The answer is industry
What is difference between mediation and conciliation?
Though the two terms have a number of similarities, there are also some differences between conciliation and mediation, no matter which definition is used. In both cases, a neutral third party seeks to help two, or possibly more, opposing sides find a suitable resolution to a conflict. In some cases, the differences between conciliation and mediation definitions will determine how that neutral third-party acts. No universal definition currently exists for these alternative forms of dispute resolution, but there are still some distinct differences. In some cases and jurisdictions, the differences between conciliation and mediation are determined by the amount of power the third party has. In mediation, the mediator will facilitate a discussion between the parties, and may or may not offer opinions on the strength of each side's argument. When no opinion is offered, it is called facilitative mediation. In cases where an opinion is offered, it is evaluative mediation. Overall, no matter which method is chosen, the mediator still does not have the right to impose his or her will on the two parties. This could be the major difference based on some definitions of conciliation and mediation. For example, a conciliator will not only offer an opinion on the relative strengths of the case, but also issue a binding opinion, if the parties agree to that ahead of time. The opinion offered is likely to be based on the law, but may factor in other less concrete considerations if the parties agree. This type of dispute resolution process is often more formal, simply because the decision will be binding, at least on a temporary basis. In some localities, the difference between conciliation and mediation is the same as the difference between facilitative mediation and evaluative mediation. In other words, under this definition of conciliation, the conciliator can still offer an opinion, but that opinion has no legal weight, though it may be based on legal concepts. Therefore, unless the parties agree, the conciliator's opinion makes no difference, but it may be used by one party or the other in court to bolster a case. No matter what definition is used, the major difference between conciliation and mediation ultimately is the power of the third party. In all cases, conciliation gives slightly more power to the third party than the mediation. Conciliation or mediation may be ordered by the court system as a way of resolving disputes and relieving some of the pressure on court calendars. This is especially true in the case of marriage dissolution in some countries, though it could also be used for labour disputes, or nearly any type of contract disagreement.
