What is the difference between reliability and validity?

validity is whether the results are valid so the data has no mistakes of as such in it whereas reliability is the dependability; when the results you have are accurate and are of enough quality.

Considering in test-scoring "reliability" refers to the consistency of the test scores, and "validity" refers to the accuracy of the interpretations made from those scores, then reliability is possible without validity, although validity is not possible without reliability.

Reliability is where if you repeat something and you get around the same answer each time, and validity is if it is true/legit to real life situations. The relationship between the two is that the more tests that are carried out to make it more reliable, the validity will drop because if a study is repeated because it is less true to real life.

Explain the concepts of reliability,

The difference between internal and external validity is in their nature. Internal validity indicates if a study depicts relation between two variables. External validity on the other hand generalizes the study of the variables.

Reliability: It works as expected.Safety: It doesn't endanger your life or health.

The characteristics of evaluation are: validity and reliability

validity, reliability and objectivity

"Quality is conformance to customer expectations" "Reliability is quality over time"

Double checking and verification are some of the procedures that can be followed by an organization to ensure reliability,validity and accuracy of the data information.

to test if they are measuring what they supposed to measure.

chongga balongga

validity and reliability

1. Validity 2. Reliability.

Norms reliability validity

a world of difference in quality, safety, and reliability

1.Reliability 2.Validity 3.Practicality

Validity measures how well drawn a concept is, and how accurately it responds to the real world. Its effectiveness is measured by how close it comes to validating a measure that it claims to be able to measure. Reliability, on the other hand, posits the amount of consistency in the measurement.

To ensure validity and reliability of data, market researchers can present the same surveys to different respondents within the same sample area. Using a wider sample area will also give a true picture of the results.

Reliability have to do with trustworthiness if you can trust the source while credibility have to do with facts or expertise on the specific generic area of subjects

It is a proposition which can be put to a test to determine its validity

The law is an ass. Just because something is legally right does not mean that it's morally right.

* Probability * Correlation * Validity * Reliability * Variable * Frequency distribution

There is none You're stupid why would you ask that !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

las marikas no saben pelear pinches malvivientes

Beta testing is necessary to ensure the reliability and validity of the assessment

Reliability and validity are both important yet different qualities of any measure, including IQ tests. Reliability has a number of different meanings. Reliability might refer to test-retest reliability, which means that you don't get wildly different results each time you take a test. Reliability also refers to the consistency with which observers interpret your results. You would not want two physicians disagreeing about the results of a lab test for cancer. Standardized IQ tests, such…

Recharge is for extending the validity on the card whereas Top up is when u still have validity but no currency.. top up does not increase your validity whereas recharge does..

1.Reliability 2.Validity 3.Systematic

No. Something could be reliable without necessarily being a valid construct.

reliability is how long the connection is available such as up time latency is how busy the connection is and how long it takes for data to come and go from the network

A validity statement for a bibliography talks about the reliability and reputability of the source. More reliable sources will be textbooks, .edu and .gov wbesites and will be consistent with information from other sources.

One of the basic differences between science and pseudoscience is a lack of empirical research. Empirical research must meet the rigors of validity and reliability criteria to be considered science.

In sport, suitability is how relevant something is to the chosen sport; reliability refers to how consistent results would be if the test was to be repeatedly taken and validity refers to whether or not the test measures what it claims to. Finally, practicality refers to how appropriate the current environment is for carrying out the test.

Dawn Tunks has written: 'Reliability and validity of a quality of life measure'

Validity is harder to prove because data can be valid within a specific range. Data that is reliable can be proved by using the information successfully.

One simple argument put forward is that, legal validity of laws presents the fundamental difference between natural and positive law. Natural law theorist argue that the law ought to reflect a higher law and that higher law is morality, to which the law derives its validity, whilst legal positivist believe that the legal validity comes through due process, through acts of Parliament which legislates and makes laws. morality is not a criteria for establishing legal…

reliability and validity

characteristic of research tools are reliability , validity ,usability ,economic,accuracy taking lesstime.

Some characteristic of the research process include: Reliability, Validity Accuracy Credibility Generalization Empirical Systematic Control

Elton Keith French has written: 'Validity and reliability of kinematic data from two dimensional cinematography'

Reliability - it has a wide range of results which means it is relaible... Validity- It has many turning points which means more flexion and extension of muscles i necassary this proves its validity because it is giving the appropriate outcome of the time it takes to move in many ways as it isnt a test of speed

Internal validity has to do with the accuracy of the results. Results could be inaccurate if samples are not selected randomly. External validity has to do with the generalizability of the findings to the population. If the sample selected is only Hispanics under the age of 25, then it would be hard to generalize the results to the entire US population.

Oral citations should include oral citation sources and a list of reference. This helps in conveying the validity, reliability and currency of your information.

Usability is what is referred to as the administration of the instrument in research method. Also, within the research method, you will find validity and reliability.

relevance, consistency, method of collection used, validity, reasons for which the data were collected, reliability, completenes e.t.c

construct validity

urmmm .. shows cause and effect has high control which lead to high reliability & validity

Eve-Lyn Quirk has written: 'Reliability and validity of the H-T-P as a measure of intellegence in adolescents'

The difference between a real diamond and a false diamond is hard to tell from appearance. But experts can determine the validity of the diamond by a magnified scope. This scope can extinguish the difference between the two by the color and density.