0
I think that with reliability we mean that the plans tha you propose are based on some spesific and realistic elements. With validity I think that we mean that these elements are true and modern.
What else can I help you with?
Sampling techniques can provide statistically reliable and valid survey results except?
Sampling techniques can provide statistically reliable and valid survey results except haphazard sampling.
What is the difference between reliable and unreliable communication?
RELIABILITY:- It is the ability to do a specified work/task in a specified time to maintain its functions in routine circumstances.UNRELIABILITY:-It doesn't have an ability to do a specific task/work in a specified time.
What is the most important part of data collection?
The most important part of data collection is ensuring the accuracy and quality of the data being collected. This involves following proper protocols, using reliable sources, and validating the data to ensure it is valid and reliable for analysis.
What age group shows the greatest difference between males and females?
The teenage years typically show the greatest difference between males and females in terms of physical and psychological development. This can be attributed to the hormonal changes and growth spurts that occur during this period, leading to noticeable disparities between males and females in areas such as height, muscle mass, and emotional maturity.
What quality did Max Weber stress as being the hallmark of social research?
Weber stressed the importance of objectivity in social research. He believed that researchers should strive to remain impartial and free from bias in their observations and analysis in order to produce valid and reliable results.
What is the difference between a valid test and a reliable test?
Reliable indicates that each time the experiment is conducted, the same results are obtained (accuracy). Valid indicates the experiment (or test) has controlled variables and used an appropriate method/model.
Is a reliable test necessarily valid?
In my view reliable test is always valid.
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable?
Is it possible for an operational definition to be valid but not reliable
What is the difference between slection crieteria and validity and reliability?
Social and Medical sciences uses these statistical concepts. ideally, we have to measure the same way each time, but intrasubject, interobserver and intraobserver variance occur, so we have to anticipate and evaluate them. In short, it is the repeatability of a measurement, by you, myself and everybody person or instrument. Validity is how much the mean measure that we got is near of the true answer or value. So, an instrument can be reliable but not valid, valid but not reliable, both valid and reliable, nor valid neither reliable. I suggest that you imagine a target: you can aim and 1) always get the center (both valid and reliable) 2) always get the same distant point (reliable but not valid) 3) err much around the true center (valid but not reliable - the mean and median of your arrow's shot will get the center) 4) err much around the another center, false one (nor valid neither reliable) I did not understood exactly what selection criteria have to do with the rest of question, so, left in blank ;-)
What is the difference between a valid trust and enforceable contract?
a valid trust is true and an enforcebale trust can be enforced
A test may be reliable but not necessarily validIs it possible for a test to be valid but not reliable?
A test may be reliable but not valid. A test may not be valid but not reliable. For example, if I use a yard stick that is mislabeled to measure the distance from tee to hole in golf on different length holes, the results will be neither reliable nor valid. If you use the same stick to measure football fields that are the same length the result will reliable (repeatable, consistent) but not valid (wrong numbers of yards). There is no test that is unreliable (repeatable, consistent) and valid (measures what we are looking for).
Why is it possible to have a reliable measure that is not valid but impossible to have a valid measure that is not reliable?
A reliable measure is consistent and yields consistent results, so it may not be measuring the intended construct accurately (lack validity). On the other hand, a valid measure accurately assesses the intended construct, but it must be consistent and produce stable results (reliable) to ensure that the measurements are dependable and trustworthy.
What is the difference between a valid deductive argument and a fallacy?
A valid deductive argument will have a valid premise and conclusion and a fallacy may be true, it all matters on how you came to the conclusion.
What is the difference between valid and genuine?
The difference between genuine and original is very simple. Genuine is something that is real while original is the first of something.
What is the difference between accurate and reliable results?
a accurate result would be true as possible but a reliable result would be one that is compared
Why it is important to distinguish valid and faulty generalizations?
Distinguishing between valid and faulty generalizations helps ensure that conclusions drawn from specific instances are accurate and reliable. Valid generalizations are based on sound reasoning and evidence, while faulty ones can lead to misinformation and unfair judgments. By being able to identify the difference, we can make better decisions and avoid stereotyping or making misleading assumptions.
What is the difference between a valid fact and a valid argument?
Facts cannot be valid. They can only be true or false. Arguments, on the other hand, can be valid. A valid argument in one which must have a true conclusion provided that the premises are true (no guarantee of that though).
