Philosophy can have the luxury of emotions as is evident from the fact that poetry is a kind of philosophy. But science is not permitted to wallow in emotions. It is meant to be impartial and unemotional like mathematics.
The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic. On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.
Phil Hutchinson has written: 'There is no such thing as a social science' -- subject(s): Philosophy and social sciences 'Shame and philosophy' -- subject(s): Shame, Emotions (Philosophy)
Philosophy of science is a branch of philosophy that examines the foundations, methods, and implications of science. It explores questions about the nature of scientific knowledge, the scientific method, and the relationship between science and other areas of human inquiry.
The difference between science and philosophy is that the science studies reality in a methodical way, while that the philosophy ponders her through reasoning and logic. On the one hand, science wants to explain what that surrounds us, and does so through your knowledge.
There is no difference.
Science and philosophy are fundamentally different in several ways: Science, ultimately, must be testable. That is, science makes predictions that must correspond to some sort of observable and repeatable phenomenon that can be verified. Science is objective - given the same conditions, different observers will observe the same phenomenon (although they may disagree on its interpretation). Beyond these basics there are many similarities between philosophy and science (once known as "natural philosophy") such as self-consistency and the construction of theories.
jgjkkgjkg
Philosophy is no longer a field of Science at all. Science, specifically Physics, did develop from Philosophy, and other Sciences developed from Physics. This (above) explains the term "PhD" (Doctor of Philosophy) and "Physician". There are many differences between Philosophy and Science. The most important is probably that Science deals exclusively with physical objects (living or not), while Philosophy has a wider area of concern. Also, in Science, questions can (often) be answered by performing an experiment. If everyone agrees that the experiment was designed and done well, the results are accepted as "the correct answer." It is not like that in Philosophy.
The primary difference between science and philosophy is that science works on experiment, while philosophy with theories. While learning from both angles is necessary to our understanding of the universe, there are certain cases where one applies and the other does not. When philosophy applies and science does not, it is usually an untestable theory like string theory, Man made climate change and the existence of god. When the reverse is true, things are being discovered which are not predicted or even contradicted by know logic, my main example here is quantum mechanics, and previously life science before 'Origin of the Species', basically anything we are categorizing without understanding.
There are allot of difference but the main difference is the science is discovered while the literature is invented
I don't see a difference really. the future will always involve science
All science is knowledge but not all knowledge is science.