"Plaintiff's" is the possessive form of "plaintiff," indicating something belonging to a single plaintiff. "Plaintiffs'" is the plural possessive form, indicating something belonging to multiple plaintiffs.
if the bottle was white then the plaintiffs should have amounted to contributory negligence
To refer to two plaintiffs without indicating possession, you would write "two plaintiffs" or "2 plaintiffs." This form does not suggest ownership or possession.
The plural possessive form, plaintiffs'consent, is the correct form for the consent of the plaintiffs.
If you are talking about one plaintiff, then it is: Plaintiff's Complaint. If it is the complaint of many plaintiffs, then it would be: Plaintiffs' Complaint.
The plural form of plaintiff is plaintiffs.
The correct possessive form of "Plaintiffs" is "Plaintiffs'." This is because the word "Plaintiffs" is already a plural noun, so to indicate possession, an apostrophe is added after the final "s." Using "Plaintiffs's" would be redundant and incorrect in standard English grammar.
The facts are straightforward and undisputed. On December 30, 2002, plaintiffs purchased a new motor home manufactured by defendant, which is located in Indiana. From the time that plaintiffs took possession of the motor home, water continuously leaked into it. Plaintiffs took the motor home to the dealer for repair of the leaks on several occasions, but the dealer failed to successfully fix the leaks. Plaintiffs also had several phone conversations with representatives of defendant, including the president of defendant, but again the leaks were not corrected. On December 23, 2003, plaintiffs' attorney mailed a letter to defendant notifying it of the leaks and the failed attempts to correct the leaks. In the letter, plaintiffs asked defendant to replace the vehicle in accordance with ORS 646.335. (1) The letter did not reach defendant until December 29, 2003, and plaintiffs filed their complaint the next day. (2) The trial court entered a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, rejecting defendant's contention that it did not have an opportunity to correct the defect before plaintiffs filed the action.
The abbreviation of potential difference is V, which stands for voltage.
The plural form of plaintiff is plaintiffs.
In Goss v. Lopez, the plaintiffs sought to challenge the constitutionality of the suspension procedures used by the Columbus, Ohio, public schools. They argued that the students were denied due process rights under the Fourteenth Amendment, as they were suspended without a hearing or formal notice. The plaintiffs aimed to ensure that students facing suspensions receive adequate notice and an opportunity to present their side before disciplinary actions are taken. Ultimately, the case sought to establish the principle that public school students have certain rights to due process.
Plaintiffs do not have a surrebuttal. They have a rebuttal. Defendants reply is the surreebuttal. Plaintiffs case in chief Defendants case in chief Plaintiffs rebuttal Defendants surrebuttal