an iPod nano has a smaller body mass and memory and cheaper value, while with the ipod classic is fairly larger in size memory and of course the price lol
an Itouch has a touch screen and a ipod does
ok well just recently they rename the ipod to ipod classic and the ipod nano is still the same. ipod classic is bigger in size, has bigger screen, holds more songs etc. if u live in the US then here r the prices: iPod Nano - 4GB - $149 iPod Nano - 8GB - $199 iPod Classic - 80GB - $249 iPod Classic - 160GB - $349
The I-pod touch has a touch screen.
No, iPod Classic's do not have a touch screen. They are controlled via a 'Click Wheel'
Well, depends on how new the "Ipod Classic" is.. If it is new, the 2008 models, it is just a new version of the ipod video. If it is a older version its a ipod minus the ability to playback video.
The difference in the iPod Nano is it holds less content. It also has a smaller screen. I would suggest the iPod classic (the new version of iPod videos) if you are wanting to buy an iPod. Now there is also the iPod Nano that is a video too. If you do not have more than 2000 songs in your library and would also like videos on your iPod than i would suggest that. :)
its got more gigo bytes and the space much bigger. the ipod nano is little and has little bit of space but the ipod classic has 80 and 160 gb. does that help:)
no it dose not yet
as long as its the same ipod yes.
ipod nano is smaller and skinnyer
No way. Are you a retard. The touch screen is needed. Does an iPod classic have one? No.
ipod shuffle because it is easy to lose and no screen and in 2nd place ipod classic because it is just a bigger version of the ipod nano and it is just a big screen with lots of storage and it is horrible