A trial court convenes juries, conducts trials and adjudicates defendants. An appeals court hears appeals of the trial court's trials - does not convene juries - does not conduct trials - and renders juedgements on the application of law and proper procedures.
Actually a court of appeals cannot decide that. A court of appeals can only decide whether or not the trial court correctly followed procedures and existing legal precedence. It is entirely possible for procedures and legal precedence to be completely unfair (they have been many times) but if the trial court properly followed them, the court of appeals must support the trial court's decision. If the court of appeals decides that the trial court failed to follow procedures and/or existing legal precedent, then the case must be retried in a trial court.
No.
The appellate court.
Appeals courts do not hear trials.
The Court of Appeals.
Not a true statement. Trial Courts do NOT hear appeals. That function is assigned to the Court of Appeals.
A court of appeals has the jurisdiction to hear appeals. Some appeals are mandatory and the court has to hear them. Other appeals are discretionary and the court of appeals may deny to hear them.
The California Circuit Court of Appeals.
appeals courts review decisions of trial courts for errors of law.
No the procedure for a cease heard in an Appeal's court does not differ much from the procedure in a trial court.
The State Supreme Court
court of appeals