most experts today agree that Homo heidelbergensis is the most likely candidate for being the immediate ancestor to man.
The Evolution of Man - 1920 was released on: USA: October 1920
Unfortunately, the evolution of man cannot be traced in a continuous way. This is why many people doubt that the theory of evolution is more than a theory. Scientific evidence does follow the evolution of man but there are gaps that are not explained.
evolution
Man is an ape. The evolution of one is the evolution of the other. Genetics in a particular immediate environment and reproductive isolation leads to the variences in two species that share very recent common ancestors.
There isnt any noticeable evolution,..jst the way apes changed to man,........y not other animals show any changes?
the becoming of man
charles darwin
evolution does not depend on what man thinks.; it does not really matter.
There are thousands of instances of direct evidence of evolution. The most well-known example is that of Darwin's Finches. These finches were observed through fossil records to have changed over time to adapt to their environment.
No. Evolution is a consequence of selective pressure(s) from the environment acting on organisms. Virtually all living beings are not conscious of this process.The only species that *could* consciously direct its own evolution is Homo sapiens (humans), but currently it doesn't.Artificial selection can and has consciously directed evolution, but it always was a species acting over other different species, not on their own evolution.
Man
Polyploidy in plants, for one instance the doubling of chromosomes at mating, is direct evidence not only for evolution but for speciation as well. I fact many to most modern angiosperm species are developed this way.