There isn't one. 'Move' here is used intransitively. However, in 'he moved his mother to California', the object would be 'mother'. There is no direct object in this sentence, only an indirect object (California).
For a verb to be transitive it must have a subject and an object. In order to make "moved" a transitive verb, the sentence would have to begin with a subject who did the moving and end with an object that was moved by the subject.
it moved
An object that is moved by physical exertion is one definition
Judge by the distance it has moved in relation to another object.
A bonanza is a large mineral deposit of great value. Many moved to California in search of a vast gold bonanza.
If an object has moved, I would say it has moved; there has been moment.
The redwood trees are native to California so did not have to be moved there.
That particular example is faulty because you have no object. The sentence "who can you go with?" is a form of "you can go with whom" but whom sounds odd when moved from the object position. In informal writing and dialogue, you will often end a sentence with a preposition when you want the object first in the sentence: "Bob is the only one I'm sending this to" instead of "I'm only sending this to one who happens to be Bob."
When I first moved to California, I used to wander around just to admire the natural beauty of the place.
It moved a lot of people into California.
They have always lived in California. They moved from Sacramento (Northern California) to Mailbu (Southern California).
The correct verb form is: will be moved