0
31 miles
Wiki User
∙ 10y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
When was Ramleh Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery created?
Ramleh Commonwealth War Graves Commission Cemetery was created in 1917.
When was Henry Stanford born?
Henry Stanford was born on January 22, 1872, in Ramleh, Egypt.
Taji farouki family from ramleh palestine?
Yes, they are originally from Ramle, Palestine. I am a Taji-Farouki myself and I confirm this through my father, and grandfather who was born in Ramle.
The Arabs who lived in Ramla and the rest Israel were before 48 were never called Palestinias what you are not writin the exact?
The original inhabitants of Palestine are the Arabs and they are called Palestinians. The illegal,racist and criminal entity so called Israel was established in 1948. Under the BRITISH mandate that land was called Palestine,and before that it was under the Ottoman empire known as PALESTINE. My family root is from RAMLEH, We call our self proudly as Palestinians and forever so.
What has the author Michal Peled Ginsburg written?
Michal Peled Ginsburg is an Israeli filmmaker known for her documentaries that often focus on social and political issues in the Middle East. Some of her works include "Ramleh" and "Revenge of the Fathers."
Can Amaury French name be used for man?
To the best of my knowledge, Amaury is a name for boys in French (or other latin languages) and German. See the name origin references: AMALRIC m Ancient Germanic Pronounced: A-mal-rik, a-MAL-rik Derived from the Germanic elements amal "work, labour" and ric "power". This was the name of two rulers of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem in the 12th century. Amalaric (died 531), king of the Visigoths, son of Alaric II, was a child when his father fell in battle against Clovis I, king of the Franks (507). He was carried for safety into Spain, which country and Provence were thenceforth ruled by his maternal grandfather, Theodoric the Ostrogoth, acting through his vice-regent, an Ostrogothic nobleman named Theudis. In 522 the young Amalaric was proclaimed king, and four years later, on Theodoric's death, he assumed full royal power in Spain and a part of Languedoc, relinquishing Provence to his cousin Athalaric. He married Clotilda, daughter of Clovis; but his disputes with her, he being an Arian and she a Catholic, brought on him the penalty of a Frankish invasion, in which he lost his life in 531. Amaury I (1162-1174), brother of Baldwin III, succeeded to the throne on the latter's death, being only twenty-seven years of age. He was one of Jerusalem's most brilliant sovereigns, and thought to profit by the anarchy that prevailed in Egypt in order to acquire possession of that country, reaching Cairo twice (1167 and 1168); and, for the moment, having Egypt under his protectorate. But the formation of Saladin's power soon placed the kingdom in peril. Amaury died prematurely in 1174, leaving as his successor his son Baldwin IV (1174-1185), a very gifted young man, who had been the pupil of William of Tyre, but who was attacked with leprosy and rendered incapable of taking charge of affairs. He at first reigned under the guardianship of Milon de Planci and, assisted by Renaud de Châtillon, inflicted a defeat upon Saladin at Ramleh (1177).
How long was the Holocaust?
The holocaust in the sense of systematic exterminationlasted from 1941 till 1945. (Jews had been persecuted in Germany since 1933).June 1941 (with the start of the activities of the mobile killing units behind German lines in the Soviet Union) till May 1945, when the last concentration camps were liberated.
Who was Joseph of arimathea supposedly reladted to and how?
Tradition has it that Joseph was related to Mary, but this is pure invention, or, at the very least, speculation. All four gospels record that Jesus was laid in Joseph's own tomb that he had prepared for his own burial one day. They also record that he was a just and good man, and was from the Jewish city of Arimathea (probably the city once called Ramleh 1 Sam 19), he was a member of the Jewish Council (the Sanhedrin) and was a secret follower of Jesus - secret for fear of the other council members. Other than that little is known of Joseph. There are many other apocryphal accounts that mention Joseph but their providence is rather suspect. Tradition has it that he even came to the UK bringing with him a young Jesus as a boy - on his travels as a merchant to Glastonbury, in the south-west of the country. Whilst the Romans did have lead mines near Glastonbury, and did export lead to other parts of the empire including Judaea, and whilst the great theologian Tertullian wrote that Christianity was already in England in the first Century, all the evidence of Joseph coming to the UK, being a merchant, and even related to jesus, is all speculation and has no real basis in scripture.
Do the Gospels describe historical persons?
Jesus Christ, the Gospels' central person was historical. Read the Answers.com answer on 'how do you know Jesus existed' to see the overwhelming documentation on his life.Next comes Paul, and we have a great deal of evidence supporting his historical existence, including many letters that were written to churches across the Roman Empire, plus archaological evidence of the churches themselves, and including early Christian documentation in the catacombs in Rome itself.Of the '12 disciples', there are no doubts that these too were historical. After the resurrection and the coming of the Holy Spirit, these disciples are believed to have spread across the then-known world to spread the gospel message. Peter went to Rome to found the Christian Church there, Thomas founded the Church in India, Philip in Africa ad so on. Jameswent to Spain and is buried there. The evidence is from the Churches themselves, and the archaeological remains that still exist in many of these places.Of the '72' - the 'outer circle' of disiiples whom Jesus sent out to prepare the way for his missions, we are uncertain of their authenticity as we do not know their names. However, tradition holds that John Mark was one of them - and we know that John Mark accompanied Paul on his missionary journeys - and his remains are believed to be buried in the basilica in Venice.John the Baptist was known to have existed by Paul and Luke, although, there is absolutely no reliable evidence to suggest that he died later than the gospels attest. The daughter of Herod and Herodias, who danced and caused the death of John, is not mentioned in scripture, but in other sources she is identified as Salome - just one of thousands of cases where secular material corroborates scripture.Of the women, Mary Magdalene's fate is uncertain, but the early Church from the first century, regarded her as an historical person.Of the ruling classes, Herod and Pilate are regarded as historical because there is much evidence outside scripture attesting to their existence. Similarly, both Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimathea were regarded as very real people by the early Church - who could trace their own teaching back just a generation or so to the apostles themselves. Arimathea, far fom being 'fictional' has always been identified with the town of Ramleh where David came to Samuel (1 Samuelchapter 19), and to suggest otherwise is misleading.Regarding lesser characters like Lazarus, again there is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that the Lazarus of Luke's Gospel should be identified with the Lazarus of Bethany, just as James the apostle and brother of John is not the same person as James the brother of Jesus, or John the apostle is not John the Baptist. There were many fictional characters spoken about by Jesus in his parables - a Lazarus (who we are told is a beggar who begged by the gate of the Temple), the Prodigal Son, the Good Samaritan and so on. But Lazarus, whom Jesus rose from the dead, the brother of Mary and Martha, is undoubtedly a real character. The early Church regarded him as real, and his raising from death was one of the watershed moments which instigated the plot of the Jewish ruling council against Jesus.Finally, there are many minor characters like Luke, Lydia, Philemon, Timothy, Silas, Barnabas and so on who are regarded as real people by, for example, Paul and others. Therefore, it is beyond belief that an already established historical character in Paul should write about these as living, historical characters with whom he walked and talked, if they were fiction.
