not from the original word by adding prefix
original
The opposite form of the word "expendable" by adding a prefix is unexpendable.
No, "re-" is a prefix, and "apply" is the root word. "Reapply" is a word formed by adding the prefix "re-" to the root word "apply."
The adding a prefix to the word "add" would result in the word "postadd".
No, "un-" is a prefix that is added to words to indicate a negation or reversal of the word's meaning. "Unbelievable" is a word itself, formed by adding the prefix "un-" to "believable."
Adding the prefix "over-" to the word "priced" changes the meaning of the word to "priced higher than usual or beyond reasonable value".
It modifies the root word in a positive way.
Adding the prefix in makes it not. For example inadequate. It means NOT adequate.
The opposite form of the word "expendable" by adding a prefix is unexpendable.
Both of does prefixes mean not. In this case, these prefixes make words the opposite of what they mean.
No, "dime" is not a prefix. It is a stand-alone word that refers to a coin worth 10 cents in the United States.
raging
Yes, adding "Mr." before a name is considered a prefix. It is a title commonly used before a man's name to show respect or formality.
when adding a prefix, the spelling of the root word doesn't change
It will change the meaning.C.It has no effect.
Im- is the correct prefix. This would make the word immature.
super
Adding the prefix an- to the word icteric forms anicteric, which means not icteric.