0
The particle model of matter states:
1. All matter is made up of very small particles. The particles are much too small to observe with the naked eye or with a light microscope.
2. There are spaces between the particles. The amount of space between the particles is different for different states of matter. For example, gases have much more space between particles than solids do.
3. The particles are attracted to each other. The strength of the attraction depends on the type of material.
4. the motion of the particles increases or decreases when the temperature increases or decreases.
Extra Information:
Solid: Particles are packed together tightly. This means that a solid will hold a definite shape. They particles are constantly vibrating in place.
Liquid: Particles are in contract with each other, but can slip and slide past one anther. This means that a liquid takes shape of the container.
Gas:Particles have large spacing. Can move freely in all directions. Takes the shape of the container
Wiki User
∙ 12y ago
Wiki User
∙ 11y agotiny particles
all particles of one substance are the same
different substances are made of different particles
the particles are always moving
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What is standard particle model?
The collective scientific understanding of the particles that make up matter and the known forces through which they interact is known as "the Standard Model of particle physics" or simply, the Standard Model.
How do they make particle board?
sawdust
Does a laser make use of the wave nature of light or the particle nature of light or both?
Lasers don't really "make use" of either the wave or particle nature of light. Or they make use of both. But because a laser emits what is called coherent light, it could be argued that the wave nature of light is best at describing the light the laser emits.Lasers make use of Boltzmann energy distribution statistics, which doesn't have anything to do with the particle or wave description of light. Lasers work by creating a population inversion in a chemical compound which creates stimulated emission when excited.Light has both wave-like and particle-like properties at the same time. It is said to exhibit particle-wave duality. Light is what it is -- the fact that we describe it using both a particle and a wave description is only a reflection of our inability to fully describe light in using one single intuitive model (because we have no intuitive experience with things that have both wave and particle properties simultaneously).
What is a chemical particle?
A chemical particle refers to the small portion of matter that make a particular chemical. For instance, the helium nucleus is an alpha particle with 2 neutrons and 2 protons.
What particle changes is required to make an element an isotope?
neutrons
What is the particl model?
The Particle Model of Matter is a scientific description of the tiny particles that make up all things.
What predictions does the Standard Model make and what would refute it?
Probably one of the most well known predictions that the standard model makes, is the prediction of the existence of the Higgs Boson particle - a particle that should be responsible for all of the mass in the universe. Without this particle, the standard model falls apart, but it is yet to be found. The primary ambition of the Large Hadron Collider, was to find this particle, but it is yet to achieve that goal.
How does the mass of the magnesium changes using the particle model?
i will burning quickly and joined together to make a compound.
What is standard particle model?
The collective scientific understanding of the particles that make up matter and the known forces through which they interact is known as "the Standard Model of particle physics" or simply, the Standard Model.
What are four tips for testimony in your speeches?
-Make sure DO NOT misquote someone -Make sure DO NOT violate the meaning of statements -Make sure DO NOT quote out of context
Did the Indus valley create the clay model of four wheeled cart?
indus did make the four wheel cart, so the answer is YES!!
How fast can a 300cc four wheeler go?
depends on the make and model but normally 45+ to 55+
How do they make particle board?
sawdust
What is an particle?
A particle is a substance in the body that all your cells and blood are made up of. They also make up your body along with your cells.You old particle!
Is gravity a fundamental force or a curvature of space-time?
There are basically two schools of thought about gravity, one I shall call the curvature or Einstein model, and the other one I shall call the particle model. The Einstein model asserts that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and is the one predominately thought in schools, mainly because the particle model is more difficult to explain. The particle model on the other hand asserts that, just like the other forces of nature, the force of gravity is transmitted via a virtual spin-2 particle called the graviton. The particle model also says that the graviton affects, or couples to, each other particle including other gravitons. The predictions these models make are the same, because gravitons couple to everything, and to themselves, they can certainly give the same appearance as a theory of bent spacetime because there is no way to distinguish it (because there is nothing that does not couple to the graviton, and thus gravity) from a model with a rigid spacetime but with graviton self-interaction. In fact using the framework of quantum field theory, one can show that one arises at exactly the same equations using the particle model as when using the curvature model. The curvature model is older, being the model Einstein used himself, but the particle model seems to put gravity on equal footing as the other three fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) which is also very pleasing. The particle model, however, has not yet been successfully been merged with the other three forces due to internal inconsistencies. We have not yet seen a graviton in a particle collider because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other forces (consider a simple magnet able to lift up a piece of iron even with the entire gravity of the Earth pulling on it!) so a graviton would only couple very weakly so it would be very hard to detect. In fact I can probably not overstate how hard it would be. A graviton couples so weakly that its influence would only become important in particle interactions at very high energies, and it is likely that at that point new physics will also emerge, such as the possible discreteness of space and time for example.
Is gravity a force or a curvature of space time?
There are basically two schools of thought about gravity, one I shall call the curvature or Einstein model, and the other one I shall call the particle model. The Einstein model asserts that gravity is a curvature of spacetime and is the one predominately thought in schools, mainly because the particle model is more difficult to explain. The particle model on the other hand asserts that, just like the other forces of nature, the force of gravity is transmitted via a virtual spin-2 particle called the graviton. The particle model also says that the graviton affects, or couples to, each other particle including other gravitons. The predictions these models make are the same, because gravitons couple to everything, and to themselves, they can certainly give the same appearance as a theory of bent spacetime because there is no way to distinguish it (because there is nothing that does not couple to the graviton, and thus gravity) from a model with a rigid spacetime but with graviton self-interaction. In fact using the framework of quantum field theory, one can show that one arises at exactly the same equations using the particle model as when using the curvature model. The curvature model is older, being the model Einstein used himself, but the particle model seems to put gravity on equal footing as the other three fundamental forces (electromagnetism, weak and strong forces) which is also very pleasing. The particle model, however, has not yet been successfully been merged with the other three forces due to internal inconsistencies. We have not yet seen a graviton in a particle collider because gravity is extremely weak compared to the other forces (consider a simple magnet able to lift up a piece of iron even with the entire gravity of the Earth pulling on it!) so a graviton would only couple very weakly so it would be very hard to detect. In fact I can probably not overstate how hard it would be. A graviton couples so weakly that its influence would only become important in particle interactions at very high energies, and it is likely that at that point new physics will also emerge, such as the possible discreteness of space and time for example.
How do we make artificial elements?
In particle accelerators.
