Plural is a number, not a tense (e.g. the snail is singular number, the snails is plural number).
A tense is the time frame of a verb (e.g. I go is present tense, I went is past tense).
In English, the plural is usually formed by adding -s, or -es after vowels or sibilants, with a few irregulars (e.g. child/children, man/men, woman/women, ox/oxen, etc.) and some foreign plurals (fungus/fungi, criterion/criteria, etc.).
No. As 'you' refers to either second person singular or plural noun, it takes a plural verb of 'to be'. As you want to refer to the past tense in your sentence, the plural verb of 'to be' in the past tense is 'were'. The correct sentence should be like this: You were not there.
verbs that do not follow the basic rule when making past tense and or plural form
The plural present tense of "to be" is "are."
Had is the past tense of have. Had does not have a plural, it is a past tense verb
The plural past tense is were.I am - I wasHe, she, it is - he, she, it waswe are - we wereyou are - you werethey are - they were
the past tense of Rule isRuled
There is no plural past tense of road. Road is a noun, not a verb.
The grammar tense of "your clothes are filthy" is present tense. The verb "are" indicates that the action of being filthy is currently happening.
No, "had" is the past tense of the verb "have" and does not have a plural form.
The word "rules" can be either a noun or a verb. As a noun, it's the plural form of rule. As a verb, it's the present tense, third person singular conjugation of rule.
The past tense of "sing" in plural form is "sang."
In English grammar, we use the plural form of verbs with all subjects except for third person singular (he, she, it). This rule applies to the present indefinite tense to show that the action is happening currently or regularly. Therefore, we say "we use" instead of "we uses" in the present indefinite tense to match the subject "we."