Plural is a number, not a tense (e.g. the snail is singular number, the snails is plural number).
A tense is the time frame of a verb (e.g. I go is present tense, I went is past tense).
In English, the plural is usually formed by adding -s, or -es after vowels or sibilants, with a few irregulars (e.g. child/children, man/men, woman/women, ox/oxen, etc.) and some foreign plurals (fungus/fungi, criterion/criteria, etc.).
The word "rules" can be either a noun or a verb. As a noun, it's the plural form of rule. As a verb, it's the present tense, third person singular conjugation of rule.
No. As 'you' refers to either second person singular or plural noun, it takes a plural verb of 'to be'. As you want to refer to the past tense in your sentence, the plural verb of 'to be' in the past tense is 'were'. The correct sentence should be like this: You were not there.
verbs that do not follow the basic rule when making past tense and or plural form
They are.
The plural present tense of "to be" is "are."
The plural past tense is were.I am - I wasHe, she, it is - he, she, it waswe are - we wereyou are - you werethey are - they were
Had is the past tense of have. Had does not have a plural, it is a past tense verb
There is no plural past tense of road. Road is a noun, not a verb.
The rule for using "wasn't" and "weren't" is based on the subject of the sentence. "Wasn't" is the contraction of "was not" and is used with singular subjects (I, he, she, it) in the past tense. In contrast, "weren't" is the contraction of "were not" and is used with plural subjects (you, we, they) and the singular "you" in the past tense.
It is the past tense of "have" and is used for both singular and plural. I had, we had, you had, he had, they had.
the past tense of Rule isRuled
The past tense of sing is sang. It is the same for singular and plural subjects.