Want this question answered?
army orders are like rules but their serious and you have too folllow them no matter what you can easily get kicked out the army without following orders. army orders are like rules but their serious and you have too folllow them no matter what you can easily get kicked out the army without following orders.
We are all responsible for our actions, whether obeying orders or not.
"We were following orders"
It provides the labor force jobs and persons in military service a steady job and production company a steady orders to mft. goods to the armed forces>
They claimed that they were just following orders.
Unless you are in a very senior position you don't question military orders.
Active Duty Operational Support orders
Yes, violations of the Law of Armed Conflict can not be defended by "I was just following orders". You cannot defend yourself by saying you were following orders that are illegal to begin with. If you followed an order that you know is to be illegal, you're just as guilty as your officers that commanded you to. If an officer gave me an order to shoot a disarmed and surrendered enemy combatant and I did, I'm just as guilty as my officer telling me to. It's not that hard.
one who carries orders or sends orders (of some type)
the importance of following direction is if you read the direction you can be perfect
Soldiers are expected to follow orders, including orders about training.
army orders are like rules but their serious and you have too folllow them no matter what you can easily get kicked out the army without following orders. army orders are like rules but their serious and you have too folllow them no matter what you can easily get kicked out the army without following orders.
They faced several problems. One was that not all the fighters were military, so they did not take their orders from the military. Their leader often contradicted military orders. Another was that they were greatly outnumbered.
The military was part of the monarchy and the Queen was the person who gave the orders.
Yes he has to go, that's why they are called orders. He can request a change in orders, but if it is denied then he must go.
No, military law does not require soldiers to blindly follow orders. Soldiers are expected to adhere to lawful orders, but they also have a responsibility to refuse or report orders that are illegal, violate human rights, or go against the principles of morality and ethics. This is known as the principle of lawful disobedience.
with orders and a military ID you will be fine. It is suggested you have a passport (for leave) but you can even travel back to the states with your leave paperwork and your mil id.