0
What is the important contributions made by the classical management theorists?
Wiki User
∙ 6y agoWant this question answered?
Be notified when an answer is posted
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What was Adam Smith contribution to the field of management?
Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations (1776), made an argument on the economic advantages that organizations and society would achieve from the division of labor, which is the breakdown of jobs into narrow, repetitive tasks. Smith concluded that division of labor increased productivity by increasing each worker's skill and dexterity, by saving time that is usually lost in changing tasks, and by the creation of labor- saving inventions and machinery. Probably, the most important influence on management was the Industrial Revolution. It began in the late eighteenth century in Great Britain, where machine power was being substituted for human power. Thanks to this movement, there was the development of big organizations. John D. Rockefeller was putting together the Standard Oil monopoly, Andrew Carnegie was gaining control of two- thirds of the steel industry, and other people were creating new businesses that would require formalized management practices. CLASSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS The roots of modern management lie within a group of practitioners and writers who gave their contributions to management which we call the classical approach. The classical approach is the term used to describe the scientific management theorists and the general administrative theorists. We can divide it into two subcategories:
Who introduced the theory of scientific management?
Then, at the beginning of the twentieth century, Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915), one of the most widely read theorists on management, introduced and developed the theory of scientific management.
Nature of management?
The coordination and organization of resources to achieve particular organizational goals and objectives is fundamental to management. Planning, organizing, leading, and controlling various activities to guarantee effective and efficient operations are all included. To deal with changing business environments, management is a dynamic and evolving process that requires adaptability and flexibility. It entails making decisions, allocating resources, and steering individuals and teams in the right direction to achieve the goals they have set for themselves. Additionally, the focus of management is on fostering positive relationships within the organization, maximizing productivity, and maximizing performance.
Hr strategies to increase firm performance?
Performance, in the context of organization, is not only a broad concept which has been used synonymously with productivity, efficiency, effectiveness and, more recently competitiveness, it has also been a subject of study for social scientists from a wide range of disciplinary perspectives. More recently, efforts have been made by human resource management (HRM) theorists to try to establish a causal link between HRM and performance. This has led to a growing number of studies which examine the potential contribution that good human resource policy can make to improving organizational performance. This paper is not concerned with the conceptual debate of HRM and performance. Rather, it explores whether adopting good HR practices to improve performance is a practicable approach to organizations in the UK.
What are the different management theory?
Recent Developments in Management Theory Under this category of theory are the Systems Approach, Situational or Contingency theory, Chaos theory, and Team Building theory. The systems theory has had a significant effect on management science and understanding organizations. A system is a collection of part unified to accomplish an overall goal. If one part of the system is removed, the nature of the system is changed as well. A system can be looked at as having inputs (e.g., resources such as raw materials, money, technologies, people), processes (e.g., planning, organizing, motivating, and controlling), outputs (products or services) and outcomes (e.g., enhanced quality of life or productivity for customers/clients, productivity). Systems share feedback among each of these four aspects of the system. 18 The Systems Theory may seem quite basic. Yet, decades of management training and practices in the workplace have not followed this theory. Only recently, with tremendous changes facing organizations and how they operate, have educators and managers come to face this new way of looking at things. The effect of systems theory in management is that it helps managers to look at the organization more broadly. It has also enabled managers to interpret patterns and events in the workplace - i.e., by enabling managers to recognize the various parts of the organization, and, in particular, the interrelations of the parts. The situational or contingency theory asserts that when managers make a decision, they must take into account all aspects of the current situation and act on those aspects that are key to the situation at hand. Basically, it is the approach that "it depends". For example, if one is leading troops in Iraq, an autocratic style is probably best. If one is leading a hospital or University, a more participative and facilitative leadership style is probably best. The Chaos theory is advocated by Tom Peters (1942). As chaotic and random as global events seem today, they are equally chaotic in organizations. Yet for many decades, managers have acted on the basis that organizational events can always be controlled. Thus, a new theory, known as chaos theory, has emerged to recognize that events are rarely controlled. Chaos theorists suggest that systems naturally go to more complexity, and as they do so, they become more volatile and must, therefore, expend more energy to maintain that complexity. As they expend more energy, they seek more structure to maintain stability. This trend continues until the system splits, combines with another complex system or falls apart entirely. It will need an effective manager for the latter worst scenario not to happen. 19 The last management theory is the Team Building approach or theory. This theory emphasizes quality circles, best practices, and continuous improvement. It is a theory that mainly hinges on reliance on teamwork. It also emphasizes flattening of management pyramid, and reducing the levels of hierarchy. Finally, it is all about consensus management - i.e., involving more people at all levels in decision-making. Other Management Theories In this category are the works of Edward W. Deming and Douglas McGregor. Edward Deming is the founder of modern quality management and is regarded by the Japanese as the key influence in their postwar economic miracle. He postulated several assumptions: create constancy of purpose for continual improvement of products and service; adopt the new philosophy created in Japan; cease dependence on mass inspection; build quality along with price; improve constantly and forever every process planning, production, and service; institute modern methods of training on-the-job for including management; adopt and institute leadership aimed at helping people to do a better job; drive out fear, encourage effective two-way communication; breakdown barriers between departments and staff areas; eliminate exhortations for the workforce - they only create adversarial relationships; eliminate quotas and numerical targets; remove barriers to pride of workmanship, including annual appraisals and Management by Objectives; encourage education and self-improvement for everyone; and define top management's permanent commitment to everimproving quality and productivity and their obligation to implement all these principles. Douglas McGregor (1906-1964) postulated management ideas as contained in "Theory X" and "Theory Y". Using human behavior research, he noted that the way an organization runs depends on the beliefs of its managers. 20 "Theory X" gives a negative view of human behavior and management that he considered to have dominated management theory from Fayol onwards - especially Taylorism. It also assumes that most people are basically immature, need direction and control, and are incapable of taking responsibility. They are viewed as lazy, dislike work and need a mixture of financial inducements and threat of loss of their job to make them work ('carrot and stick' mentality). "Theory Y", the opposite of "Theory X", argues that people want to fulfill themselves by seeking self-respect, self-development, and self-fulfillment at work as in life in general. The six basic assumptions for 'Theory Y' are: work is as natural as play or rest - the average human being does not inherently dislike work, whether work is a source of pleasure or a punishment (to be avoided) depends on nature of the work and its management. Second, effort at work need not depend on threat of punishment - if committed to objectives then selfdirection and self-control rather than external controls. Third, commitment to objectives is a function of the rewards associated with their achievement. Satisfaction of ego and self-actualization needs can be directed towards the objectives of the organization. Fourth, the average human being learns, under proper conditions, not only to accept but to seek responsibility. Fifth, high degrees of imagination, ingenuity and creativity are not restricted to a narrow group but are widely distributed in the population. Lastly, under the conditions of modern industrial life, the intellectual potentials of the average human being are being only partly utilized. There is, however, one theory or approach, the quantitative approach that is hardly used and known by managers. It emerges from operations research and management science. It is a mathematical and statistical solution to problems using optimization models, and computer simulations. It is most effective 21 management decision-making rather than managerial behavior. The management theories that have been discussed, important as they are, have to be translated in practice by managers.
What did Classical management theorists think?
Classical management theorists thought there was one way to solve management problems in the industrial organization
What are contributions of nursing theorists to development of nursing science?
nursing theorists and his contributions
What was Adam Smith contribution to the field of management?
Adam Smith, in The Wealth of Nations (1776), made an argument on the economic advantages that organizations and society would achieve from the division of labor, which is the breakdown of jobs into narrow, repetitive tasks. Smith concluded that division of labor increased productivity by increasing each worker's skill and dexterity, by saving time that is usually lost in changing tasks, and by the creation of labor- saving inventions and machinery. Probably, the most important influence on management was the Industrial Revolution. It began in the late eighteenth century in Great Britain, where machine power was being substituted for human power. Thanks to this movement, there was the development of big organizations. John D. Rockefeller was putting together the Standard Oil monopoly, Andrew Carnegie was gaining control of two- thirds of the steel industry, and other people were creating new businesses that would require formalized management practices. CLASSICAL CONTRIBUTIONS The roots of modern management lie within a group of practitioners and writers who gave their contributions to management which we call the classical approach. The classical approach is the term used to describe the scientific management theorists and the general administrative theorists. We can divide it into two subcategories:
What are four salient contributions of nursing theorists to the development of nursing science?
They can include having good beside manner and getting along with people. Proper note taking and the ability to catch on to little things are important as well.
Who are the quality theorists?
Some of the prominent quality theorists include W. Edwards Deming, Joseph M. Juran, Philip B. Crosby, and Armand Feigenbaum. They have contributed significantly to the development of quality management principles and approaches that have shaped the field of quality management.
Who were some of the early management theorist?
Some early management theorists include Frederick Taylor, Henri Fayol, and Max Weber. Taylor is known for scientific management, Fayol for his principles of management, and Weber for his bureaucracy theory.
Who introduced the theory of scientific management?
Then, at the beginning of the twentieth century, Frederick Winslow Taylor (1856-1915), one of the most widely read theorists on management, introduced and developed the theory of scientific management.
Which of the four W's is least important to the behavioral theorists?
The "why" is typically considered the least important to behavioral theorists, as they focus more on observable behaviors rather than delving into underlying motivations or intentions. Behavioral theorists are more concerned with studying the relationship between stimuli and responses, rather than the internal processes that drive behavior.
Philosophers Beccaria and Bentham are identified as the core theorists of?
Philosophers Beccaria and Bentham are identified as the core theorists of classical criminology, which emphasizes the rationality of individuals and the importance of deterrence in controlling criminal behavior. They both believed in the need for punishments to be proportionate to the crime committed in order to achieve justice and deterrence.
How many theorists is there?
There are numerous prominent theorists across various fields, including psychology, sociology, economics, and philosophy. The exact number of theorists is difficult to quantify, as there are countless individuals throughout history who have contributed important ideas and theories to their respective fields.
Who are some well-known female theorists?
Some well-known female theorists include Judith Butler in gender studies, bell hooks in feminist theory, and Donna Haraway in science and technology studies. These theorists have made significant contributions to their respective fields and have influenced academic discussions on various social and cultural issues.
How do learning theorists differ from social learning theorists in their ideas on behavior?
Learning theorists focus on the individual's direct experience with the environment, while social learning theorists also emphasize the influence of observing and modeling others. Learning theorists often prioritize reinforcement and conditioning, while social learning theorists highlight the role of cognitive processes and social interactions in shaping behavior.
