The law is that the attraction between electric charges is inversely proportional to the square of the distance. Note that the way the force varies with distance is identical to the gravitational force, which also follows an inverse-square law.
No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.
Both are Inverse square law. It corresponds to the concept of lines of force spreading out uniformly from a source (mass or electric charge). If you imagine these line passing through a sphere surrounding the source at a distance R, The lines have to pass through its surface area of 4pi.R^2, so their density goes inversely as the square of the radius, (inverse square law) and hence the concept of lines of force.
In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.
They both follow an inverse square law. For gravity, F =m1m2/d2 For charge, F = q1q2/d2
The concept of inverse square law was developed by Isaac Newton in the late 17th century. Newton formulated the law to describe the intensity of gravitational force, stating that the force between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This concept of inverse square law is also applicable to other physical phenomena, such as light and sound.
No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.No. Both forces obey an inverse-square law, so the ratio of electric to gravitational force will always be the same, for the same pair of particles - no matter the distance.
yes... its true...the inverse square law is universal. it can be applied to gravity between two objects, the electric force between 2 charges etc...
The inverse-square law applies to gravitational and electrical forces. An inverse-square law tells you:That the force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance.That means that if the distance is increased by a factor "n", the force is decreased by a factor "n2".For example, if you increase the distance by a factor of 10, the force will decrease by a factor of 102 = 10 x 10 = 100.
Both are Inverse square law. It corresponds to the concept of lines of force spreading out uniformly from a source (mass or electric charge). If you imagine these line passing through a sphere surrounding the source at a distance R, The lines have to pass through its surface area of 4pi.R^2, so their density goes inversely as the square of the radius, (inverse square law) and hence the concept of lines of force.
Both are Inverse square law. It corresponds to the concept of lines of force spreading out uniformly from a source (mass or electric charge). If you imagine these line passing through a sphere surrounding the source at a distance R, The lines have to pass through its surface area of 4pi.R^2, so their density goes inversely as the square of the radius, (inverse square law) and hence the concept of lines of force.
Both are Inverse square law. It corresponds to the concept of lines of force spreading out uniformly from a source (mass or electric charge). If you imagine these line passing through a sphere surrounding the source at a distance R, The lines have to pass through its surface area of 4pi.R^2, so their density goes inversely as the square of the radius, (inverse square law) and hence the concept of lines of force.
In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.In that case, the force would increase by a factor of 4. Gravity obeys an inverse-square law.
They both follow an inverse square law. For gravity, F =m1m2/d2 For charge, F = q1q2/d2
The concept of inverse square law was developed by Isaac Newton in the late 17th century. Newton formulated the law to describe the intensity of gravitational force, stating that the force between two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them. This concept of inverse square law is also applicable to other physical phenomena, such as light and sound.
Similarities: inverse square law for strength of force both r central forces both are conservative forces both follow principle of superposition Differences gravity attracts electric force electric force can change direction electrostatic force depends on interviening medium
It follows an inverse square law, analogous to both the electrostatic force and gravitational force.
Gravity is a force of attraction only. Newton's law describes only an inverse square attraction, which is different than the inverse square law of electric charge which allows both attraction and repulsion. Within the theory of general relativity, gravity has a different interpretation as curvature of space-time, but that is not essential to the present question.