answersLogoWhite

0


Best Answer

An 'ism' suffix is always 'ism'.

Realism is concerned with taking things as they are, or communicating things as close to 'real life' as possible, a fidelity and adherence to the facts of events, life and nature, without distortion, exaggeration or omission, with fair representation, so that the true reality of things/matters can be perceived/appreciated/understood by the recipient of the information.

User Avatar

Wiki User

15y ago
This answer is:
User Avatar
More answers
User Avatar

Wiki User

9y ago

The word is objectivism. Objectivism means a doctrine concerned only with fact and reality, as opposed to subjectivism which is more opinionated.

This answer is:
User Avatar

User Avatar

Wiki User

11y ago

Materialism

This answer is:
User Avatar

Add your answer:

Earn +20 pts
Q: Doctrine concerned only with fact and reality suffix ism?
Write your answer...
Submit
Still have questions?
magnify glass
imp
Related questions

Doctrine concerned only with the fact and reality?

Epistemology focuses on facts and reality by studying how knowledge is acquired and justified. It examines the nature of reality, the limits of what can be known, and the methods of evidence and reasoning needed to understand the world. Metaphysics also addresses the nature of reality by exploring the fundamental aspects of existence, such as the nature of being, existence, and reality itself.


Doctrine concerned only with fact and reality?

realism


What root of vert fit the following question a doctrine concerned only with fact and reality?

The root "ver" in "veritas" fits the description of a doctrine concerned only with fact and reality. Veritas means truth in Latin.


What doctrine is concerned only with facts and reality?

Ci-vil-ization has created for itself a "Believed to be Theoretical reality"! In which there is No wright, No Wrong; but only a relativity of point of view. Except for the above fact; there is nothing factual about ci-vil-ization!


Suffix for dread of?

suffix for dread


What are Buddhist views on human evolution?

Evolution is a fact. A fact is an agreed-upon observation made by competent observers. Before Columbus, it was a fact that the world was flat. The Buddhist view - if you are concerned about the differences between creationism and evolution, as I suspect you are because you posed this question - is that it really doesn't matter. The things we find ourselves concerned with in this life, in this apprehension of reality, seem very important to us because when we aren't enlightened we live in the day-to-day world. Even so, we need to stay aware of the fact that there is a deeper understanding of reality, in which creationism and evolution are paltry distinctions, unimportant to bringing lasting happiness to all sentient beings.


What is the difference between doctrine and principle?

In religious or scriptural terms, a doctrine is a statement of truth - a historical or eternal verity or fact. A principle is a doctrine packaged for application. Principles thus grow out of doctrine and guide their use in our lives.


What is the difference between principle and a doctrine?

A principle is a fundamental truth or belief that guides behavior or decision-making, whereas a doctrine is a set of beliefs or teachings held by a group or organization. Principles are more general and can apply to various situations, while doctrines are specific to a certain belief system or organization.


What is the name given to the doctrine of the Bible being a statement of fact?

libra


Is it possible to know for sure what reality is?

Not when you think too hard. Reality is defined by the apprehension that the brain receives, which tells the body to understand that reality is in fact reality and not just a myth or illusion. Thus, reality is life.


What are synonyms for truth?

fact, reality, perfection, trueness, rightness


What was the first country to feel the effects of George W. Bush's approach to foreign affairs referred to as the Bush Doctrine (or the doctrine of preemption)?

Afghanistan was the first country to feel the effects of the Bush Doctrine. In fact, the Bush Doctrine was used to justify the invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.