The members of the judicial service comision
two-thirds of the House of Representatives and Senate must vote to change the constitution. then the amendment must be revised by the judicial branch to make sure that the amendment is constitutional
Judicial restraint is the philosophy that judges and justices should defer to written legislation whenever possible, if it is not in conflict with the Constitution. A justice who uses judicial restraint tends to take a narrower view of the Constitution and does not attempt to broaden the definition of Amendments to fit a particular social or political agenda. The opposite of judicial restraint is judicial activism. For more information on the debate between judicial activism and judicial restrain, see Related Links, below.
Which artical of the constitution adresses the judicial branch of goverment
The biggest change from the Articles of Confederation was the creation of a stronger federal government. The Constitution created an executive and judicial branch.
# The Constitution is the supreme law of the land # When there is a conflict between the constitution and any other law, the Constitution must be followed # The judicial branch has a duty to uphold the Constitution
Article 111 discusses the powers of the Judicial Branch in the Constitution.
Article 3 of the constitution
The job of the judicial branch is to interpret the laws.
judicial reviewThe unwritten constitution includes the practice of Judicial Review of Laws.
The judicial review are some of the questions that were left open by the constitution.
the judicial branch
Judicial review is the power of the courts to determine the constitutionality of laws and actions. In the process of amending the constitution, judicial review can be used to ensure that any proposed amendments comply with the existing constitution. This helps to maintain the integrity and consistency of the constitution.