Yes; as a land animal becomes larger, the surface area to volume ratio drops, which then dictates how much energy the animal must consume. Also, due to gravity, there is a limit as to how much weight a biological construct such as bone can support.
333kg or 33m high or 33m long
elephant
the largest land animal is the elephant but the hippo is almost as big
the land thrives and grows big forests and depends on the animal. if its a water animal they thrive but the land animals don't do very well
the land thrives and grows big forests and depends on the animal. if its a water animal they thrive but the land animals don't do very well
the land thrives and grows big forests and depends on the animal. if its a water animal they thrive but the land animals don't do very well
There is a limit to how big or small a cell can be.
the land thrives and grows big forests and depends on the animal. if its a water animal they thrive but the land animals don't do very well
because it a big land and it has alot of food sources and water sources to
The land will run out of nutriance and the savanna will turn into a big desert.
There really is no limit to how big they get
There are several animals that fit that description: alligators, crocodiles, and gharials.
Because there is a physical limit to how big a planet can be - especially a terrestrial planet. A gas planet like Jupiter can be a lot larger, but only to a certain limit, after that it can only become a brown dwarf or star. Nothing apart from a star can be as large as our Sun.
There is no "giant dipper". The Big Dipper is an asterism - not a landmark. For something to be a landmark it has to be on land !