The law is different in each country. I hope that some other country colleagues can add to this for you.
In the UK it is an offense to sell an item which is;
Not as describe,
Fit for purpose
of a mechanisable quality.
However, a retailer can refuse to sell any item to any person. This means that if the price is lower on the item compare with the point of sale the company can just refuse to sell it at displayed price. e.g. A watch is selling for 5.00, it 22k gold. This is clearly wrong when the customer gets to the till the manager refuses to sell the item as its not 5.00 its actually 500.00 - you cannot demand it at that price. You can report it to the trading standards officers employed in nearly every town in the UK. There may be a trend to this type of incident at that shop.
In a situation where the product is pennies different the retailer will normally allow a sale as its a clear admin error and little is lost especially if there are a number of products on their shelving not complying. TSO's (Trading Standards Officers" can and do price / weight checks on many stores in the UK. Many errors are smoothed over by the shop concerned by allowing the sale of the one unit of stock rather than have TSOs examining their outlet. However, prosecutions have been brought against repeat offenders. There is also part of the Weights and Measures act in the UK that covers "incitement to buy"
The officers will look for
Not as described, -Is it meeting the description including the price
Fit for purpose - will it do what they say it will
Of a mechanisable quality. Is it of a lesser quality that, is it marked, broken in some way - is the best before or use by date compliant.
A shirt sold in a sale as damaged and you purchase it - and find an arm missing is as described - therefore you may find that as NOT being replaced or refunded. It a jacket is storm proof and you where it in a normal down pour you would have a case - not as described, not fit for purpose
The Office of the Law Revision Counsel prepares and publishes the United States Code, which is a consolidation and codification by subject matter of the general and permanent laws of the United States.
Frederick Abbott is an author who publishes books in relation to law and medicine.
William Alexander Price has written: 'Limited liability organizations' -- subject- s -: Business enterprises, Law and legislation, Limited liability
The Wrong Arm of the Law was created in 1963.
Robert W. Emerson has written: 'Business law' -- subject(s): Business law 'Business law the easy way' -- subject(s): Business law, Commercial law
The Newton's law is not wrong, butvalid only in the classical mechanics.
The duration of The Wrong Arm of the Law is 1.57 hours.
yes its against the law to not have a business license.
Business law is one of the courses that most business students have to take. A well rounded student should know something about policies and law in business when they are running a business, even if they aren't a lawyer. Good business people have some understanding of the law so they can conduct their business in a legal and correct fashion. Taking business law in no way means you are on the path to law.
Murphy's Law.
Jeffrey F. Beatty has written: 'Legal environment' -- subject(s): Commercial law 'Business law' -- subject(s): Commercial law, Clippings (Books, newspapers, etc.) 'Business law for a new century' -- subject(s): Cases, Commercial law, Wirtschaftsrecht 'Acetates Package (Includes Pamphlet) to Acc Business Law for a New Century' 'Essentials of business law for a new century' -- subject(s): Business law, Commercial law 'Business Law New Century'
Rate A. Howell has written: 'Fundamentals of business law' -- subject(s): Commercial law 'An introduction to business law' -- subject(s): Cases, Commercial law, Law 'Business law' -- subject(s): Cases, Commercial law