0
What is the legal term for someone who violates the law in order to comply with the law--for example a person who robs a bank in order to pay money owed to the IRS?
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
There is no such mitigation of culpability in the law. A thief is a thief, regardless of the reason for their actions.
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
Define Faraday second law of electrolysis?
Second LawFor a given quantity of electricity the quantity of substance produced is proportional to its weight.
What does Henry David Thoreau believe a person should do when he or she thinks a law is unfair Break the lawFor Apex?
Break the law For Apex!
What is fradays law of electrolysis?
First LawThe quantity of a substance produced by electrolysis is proprotional to the quantity of electricity used. Second LawFor a given quantity of electricity the quantity of substance produced is proportional to its weight.
Article III deals with which branch?
Article I of the united states constitution deals specifically with the judicial branch of the united states. in this branch, judges carry out laws that are passed on to their branch. after this, they send it to the president, who can either veto it or declare it a national lawfor all people in the united states.
What is Faraday's first law in eletrical engineering?
First LawThe quantity of a substance produced by electrolysis is proprotional to the quantity of electricity used.Second LawFor a given quantity of electricity the quantity of substance produced is proportional to its weight.
What is the procedure in Davisson-Germer experiment?
The Davisson-Germer experiment demonstrated the wave nature of the electron, confirming the earlier hypothesis of de Broglie. Putting wave-particle duality on a firm experimental footing, it represented a major step forward in the development of quantum mechanics. The Bragg Lawfor diffraction had been applied to x-ray diffraction, but this was the first application to particle waves.Davisson and Germer designed and built a vacuum apparatus for the purpose of measuring the energies of electrons scattered from a metal surface. Electrons from a heated filament were accelerated by a voltage and allowed to strike the surface of nickel metal. The electron beam was directed at the nickel target, which could be rotated to observe angular dependance of the scattered electrons. Their electron detector (which was also called as a Faraday box) was mounted on an arc so that it could be rotated to observe electrons at different angles. It was a great surprise to them to find that, at certain angles there was a peak in the intensity of the scattered electron beam. This peak indicated wave behaviour for the electrons, and could be interpreted by the Bragg Law to give values for the lattice spacing in the nickel crystal.
A battery occurs only if the victim suffers physical harm?
"Any intentional, unexcused act that creates in another person a reasonable apprehension or fear of immediate harmful or offensive contact is an assault. Apprehension is not the same as fear. If a contact is such that a reasonable person would want to avoid it, and if there is a reasonable basis for believing that the contact will occur, then the plaintiff suffers apprehension whether or not he or she is afraid. The interest protected by tort law concerning assault is the freedom from having to expect harmful or offensive contact. The occurrence of apprehension is enough to justify compensation. The completion of the act that caused the apprehension, if it results in harm to the plaintiff, is a battery, which is defined as an unexcused and harmful or offensive physical contact intentionally performed. For example, suppose that Ivan threatens Jean with a gun, then shoots her. The pointing of the gun at Jean is an assault; the firing of the gun (if the bullet hits Jean) is a battery. The interest protected by tort law concerning battery is the right to personal security and safety. The contact can be harmful, or it can be merely offensive (such as an unwelcome kiss). Physical injury need not occur. The contact can involve any part of the body or anything attached to it, such as a hat or other item of clothing, a purse, or a chair or an automobile in which one is sitting. Whether the contact is offensive or not is determined by the reasonable person standard.2 The contact can be made by the defendant or by some force the defendant sets in motion-for example, a rock thrown, food poisoned, or a stick swung." 2. The reasonable person standard is an objective test of how a reasonable person would have acted under the same circumstances. Chapter 4 - Torts and Cyber Torts from Fundamentals of Business LawFor updated links to resources available on the Web, as well as a variety of other materials, visit this text's Web site at http://fbl.westbuslaw.com You can find cases and articles on torts, including business torts, at the Internet Law Library's Web site athttp://www.lawguru.com/ilawlib/110.htm For information on the Restatements of the Law, including the Restatement (Second) of Torts and the Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability, go to the Web site of theAmerican Law Institute at http://www.ali.org
What do the Proclamation of 1763 and Quebec Act or 1774 have in common?
The Quebec Act of 1774 was an act of the Parliament of Great Britain (citation 14 Geo. III c. 83) setting procedures of governance in the Province of Quebec. The principal components of the act were:The province's territory was expanded to take over part of the Indian Reserve, including much of what is now southern Ontario, Illinois, Indiana,Michigan, Ohio, Wisconsin, and parts of Minnesota.The oath of allegiance was replaced with one that no longer made reference to the Protestantfaith.It guaranteed free practice of the Catholicfaith.It restored the use of the French civil law for private matters, except that in accordance with the English common law, it granted unlimited testamentary freedom. It maintained English common lawfor public administration, including criminal prosecution.It restored the Catholic church's right to impose tithes.The act had wide-ranging effects, in Quebec itself, as well as in the Thirteen Colonies. In Quebec, English-speaking immigrants from Britain and the southern colonies objected to a variety of its provisions, which they saw as a removal of certain political freedoms. Canadiensvaried in their reaction; the land-owning seigneurs and clergy were generally happy with its provisions although the populace resented their loss of liberties.In the Thirteen Colonies, the act, which had been passed in the same session of Parliament as a number of other acts designed as punishment for the Boston Tea Party and other protests, was passed along with the other Intolerable Acts also known as the Coercive Acts. The provisions of the Quebec Act were seen by the colonists as a new model for British colonial administration, which would strip the colonies of their elected assemblies, and promote the Roman Catholic faith in preference to widely-held Protestant beliefs. It also limited opportunities for colonies to expand on their western frontiers, by granting most of the Ohio Country to the province of Quebec.
Is Pope John Paul II Illuminati?
The real Illuminati ceased to exist in the 18th century. The Illuminati was organized to rid the Roman Catholic Church's power over the civil governments; the Illuminati were against the power of the Pope. The real Illuminati was a short lived group (1776-1785) of enlightened intellectuals whose goal was the overthrow of the oppressive monarchy controlled by the church in Rome. They were very unsuccessful in their endeavor because that monarch, Charles Theodore (Karl Theodor), Prince-Elector and Duke of Bavaria, successfully destroyed the organization and imprisoned their leadership.
How long after buying a car can it be returned?
Arizoan used car return lawFor years, Arizona law didn't protect you if your used car broke down even five minutes off the dealer's lot. "You bought it, it's yours" was the philosophy. Not anymore. Arizona now has a used-car warranty, protecting car buyers for 15 days or 500 miles, whichever comes first. During that time, as the Arizona Attorney General's office interprets it, the major systems of the car must be working. If there is a problem, you are responsible for the first $25 of the first two repair attempts. The dealer must cover the rest or void the deal and refund your money.As we see it, this law has two flaws:1. Who determines what a major system is? If the dealer decides the transmission is not a major system, then you have to take him to court. That brings us to the second flaw:2. Enforcement. If a dealer won't help you out, YOU have to take him to court. The Attorney General's office can't sue on behalf of an individual consumer. The AG's office will only take such cases when it can show a pattern of negligence. In that respect, you should still make your complaint to the AG (and the Better Business Bureau), but you should expect to handle it all on your ownThere is no overall right to return or recind a car purchase contract. Once it is executed/completed it is done. Some dealers may provide the ability to return it as part of their agreement, however they likely have many fee's involved to do so...(as well they should: your changing your mind should cost you, not them).In any of these types of car purchase/return questions - the first thing to do is look at is that stack of paperwork you got when you agreed to the deal...you know, especially the one you signed and initialed, probably several times, and likely has a big bold heading like "Contract for Sale and Agreement for Purchase". See what it says about ways and reasons you can return the car, required notices, rights to cancel, warranties, etc. This is what YOU agreed to. Not reading it (or saying you didn't understand it) - and now wanting it to be enforced only as to what you think you would have wanted it to be then...- that is just foolish. But, look at it, maybe there are grounds...Once you bought it (you and them signed and agreed to the terms, conditions and did the work on the contracts and titles), it is yours now, (and for them to accept it back, you both need to do the same things...agree/conditions/titles/etc. again).And even in the dealers where they advertise a return policy...better read it...at the very least you will be expected to pay for all the liscence, sales, registration, paperwork, etc., fees, and probably something for the fact the car, once sold...even if never moved, cannot be sold as "new" again...by law...New cars have favorable financing, rebates, some have non transferrable warranties on things, etc. available...so they probably have some calculation for those costs. Rightfully, your the one who made a new car a used one.The 3 day cancel frequently thought of is generally not applicable: Generally, the 3-day cooling off period applies to contracts signed in the customer's home - not at a company's place of business - for consumer goods worth $25 or more. And the contract must be pending…it can't be cancelled if the whatever was contracted for was done….it is a right to cancel a contract…not return things…and the a car contract is no longer pending once you have the car and title…it is completed. If this cancellation period applies, it should be stated in the contract.
What are the advantages of using motorcycle by transportation?
Motorcycle Advantages Riding a motorcycle has many advantages over a car, including: · Cheaper to run · Easier to repair · Easier to park · Harder to tow · Can stop anywhere · More flexible in traffic · Less boring · Looks cool Cheaper to run Motorcycles use much less petrol than cars Motorcycles usually use less half the petrol a car would. A motorcycle saves money you would otherwise burn up in smoke. It also saves your country money, as if a more people rode motorcycles, our dependence on foreign oil would reduce. Motorcycle riders are leaders in conservation. Easier to maintain In many ways, a motorcycle is only half a car Motorcycles are easier to repair. Firstly the engine is more accessible. You go to the bike, pull off a side cover or seat, and there is the engine. Secondly, there is less to maintain, e.g. two wheels not four. In many ways, a motorcycle is only half a car. If your costs for routine maintenance are not less than for a car, consider a new garage. Finally, many repairs you can do yourself, like changing spark plugs or fitting a new battery. Easier to park People who take half an hour to get to work, may take as long to find a park Motorcycles are easier to park than cars. People who take half an hour to get to work, may take just as long to find a park. What if you could ride right up to your building, get off, and walk in? For most motorcycle riders this is the case. A bike parks in a third of the space of a car, so you can angle park a hundred bikes where only 30 cars will fit. Even in the busiest of places, there is usually a spot to park a bike. Harder to tow Towing a bike can be a drag Being towed is a reality of life (along with death and taxes). If you are the wrong place at the wrong time you will be towed. For cars, they just lift the front or back, and tow it off. Towing a big bike is little more difficult. They can't just drag it away. It must be winched onto a trailer, and then carted off. If you chain the bike to a fixture, like lamppost, it is even more difficult to tow, as the chain must be cut. Towing a bike can be a drag. However it is not impossible, so be careful. Can stop anywhere On a bike you can pull over anytime The ability to pull over anytime is a real bonus. Imagine cruising a big city on a bike, and you get lost. On a bike, you can pull over anytime, look around, read road signs, and check map directions. In a car, stopping in a city will usually block the traffic flow. When a bike pulls over, traffic flows around it, but in a car, the traffic flow forces you on, even in directions you do not want to go! Sometimes people end up miles from where they want to be, simply because they could not stop and review their situation. Even on narrow city streets, a motorcycle can pull onto the sidewalk, for a brief "reconnaissance". Riders can stop and look around, when a car must press on. This is great for sightseeing and looking around new places. Flexible in traffic In jams, a motorcycle can usually wend its way forward It is a terrible feeling of helplessness, being in a stationary line of cars with some block up ahead. Maybe someone had a crash. In a car, you have to wait, however long it takes. You do not even know how many miles the line stretches ahead. However, in jams, a motorcycle can usually wend its way forward, which is why traffic police in many cities have returned to using motorcycles, some after not using them for many years. A motorcycle needs only half the space of a car to move Traffic flexibility is why many cities are bringing back motorcycle police - they can go where cars cannot. A motorcycle needs only half the space of a car to move. Another city situation is when drivers move into an intersection center when they cannot move out the other side. When the lights change, they just sit there, blocking the other way drivers, who honk them. However, a motorcycle can move forward through the gaps (and honk them). It is a rare case where a motorcycle has no movement options at all - after all, you can even get off the bike and walk it along! Less boring Motorcycles wake you up The main cause of car accidents is inattention. Falling asleep at the wheel, often shortly, happens more often than most people think. A car is comfortable, so if you are tired, your body tells you it is time to take a nap. Unfortunately, even a brief mini-nap can put you into oncoming traffic. In contrast, motorcycles wake you up, as on a bike you feel the wind, the wet, and the cold! So you are less likely to nod off "at the handlebars" than at the wheel. Riding can be unpleasant, but boring it is not, and this is an advantage. Looks cool What girl wants to arrive looking like the thing from the swamp? The bad-boy rider certainly has appeal, but riding to look cool, and attract the opposite sex, is a poor reason to ride, as "showing off" makes you do stupid things that defy common sense, like "wheelies." You already have two wheels instead of four, why cut it down to one. If you want get girls, get a car. Girls are more comfortable in a car for a start. There is not much conversation on a bike (some people find that a plus). Putting on a helmet messes up hair and make-up. Riding picks up road dirt. Those spare gloves can smell If it rains, forget taking your girlfriend on a bike - unless it is a test of love. What girl wants to arrive at a party looking like the thing from the swamp? Murphy's LawFor some time I tried to convince my wife it was great to go into New York on the motorcycle. One day she said, "OK." We had gear, but it was hot, with long lines into the narrow Holland tunnel lanes (no lane "sliding"). When we arrived, we were wet not from rain but sweat. Parking was easy, but this barely compensated. After a good day, the home trip was worse, as rain, thunder and lightning arrived. We waited out the worst, and then bore the rest. I remember it well - the world flashed with light, wet and windy, and she held on. Fortunately, I am still both married and riding. Still do not know whether choosing that day was her plan or mine.
