Studies on this subject vary, but the majority place the developed dependency rate of marijuana users at between 10 and 30 percent with eventual addiction rates up to 10 percent. The addiction rate is smaller than most of the harder drugs falling in at a little bit less than that of alcohol. Two factors that are not considered in current studies are the continuously growing psychoactive potency of new strains and the increased usage and acceptance facilitated by the legalization movement. While advocates of marijuana use highlight the relatively less addictive nature of marijuana, the fact remains they are promoting a behavior that is just less likely to lead to an addiction, decreased IQ, and long term legal and life issues.
Cannabis is not chemically addicting. Any addiction is purely psychological and can be dealt with "cold turkey".
No, Cannabis in itself cannot directly cause crime. Criminals cause crime, whether they use cannabis or not. I do not believe nor have I ever witnessed evidence that even the effects of cannabis use can encourage someone under the influence to commit crime. In fact quite the opposite. Cannabis is renowned for making people want to sit and do nothing at all. Let alone be bothered to go out and commit crime! There have been circumstances that PSYCHOLOGICAL addiction to cannabis could spur someone to commit crime in order to fund their addiction. But then this addiction is simply a psychological addiction. Any physical side effects felt from withdrawal, are simply pseudo, created by the concious mind and not in any way similar to substances such as nicotine, heroine or even long term alcohol use. The best way psychological addiction can be described is. "You only become psychologically addicted, to something you WANT to be psychologically addicted to." Due to the law in most countries using cannabis in itself is a crime. So if there were no cannabis the crime of cannabis use could not be commited. And once again on the other hand if there were no law against cannabis use, then that argument would be negligent. A large majority of money from illegal cannabis sales goes towards organised crime, so once again we've found another side to the dice. But yet another second glance shows that if cannabis wern't illegal it would be readily available, effectively ending a large portion of organised crimes funding. And so once again we see that every side to the dice, has an opposite face if you just take the time to turn it upside down.
There is a lack of evidence to support classifying cannabis as a Class A drug, which typically indicates substances with the highest potential for harm. Cannabis has been used for medicinal and recreational purposes for centuries with relatively low risk of addiction or overdose compared to other Class A drugs like heroin or cocaine. Many argue that regulating cannabis like alcohol or tobacco may be a more appropriate approach.
The potential dangers of cannabis use include impaired cognitive function, addiction, mental health issues, and respiratory problems. To mitigate these risks, individuals can use cannabis in moderation, avoid mixing it with other substances, seek professional help if needed, and prioritize their overall health and well-being.
No. Naturally grown cannabis is additive free, 100% natural, and non physically addictive. Whereas Cigarettes are full of hundreds of additives, have Nicotine that causes addiction that is as hard or harder to quit than heroine, and causes cancer. Cannabis has medical properties...it actually helps Cancer patients. However Cannabis when smoked does have Carbon Dioxide that is harmful to your lungs and may lead to respiratory issues. Also some people can get mentally addicted to the euphoric high that comes from Cannabis. All in all though Cannabis is a better way to go than Cigarettes...only problem though is that is is illegal in most of the world.
Classifying cannabis as a class A or B drug is a controversial topic. Supporters argue that it can pose health risks, especially for young people, due to potential cognitive impairment and addiction. Opponents argue that it has medicinal benefits and should be decriminalized or legalized for adult use.
The potential long-term effects of cannabis use on physical health may include respiratory issues, decreased cognitive function, and potential addiction. On mental health, it may lead to increased risk of anxiety, depression, and psychosis.
the biggest hazard about cannabis is that it's illegal. a quart of booze will kill most people but it would take about 1200lbs of cannabis (consumed in 15 minutes) to reach a fatal level.
0 weed has nothing in it that can get you addicted only tards think it does
While cannabis is not physically addictive, and can be quite psychologically addictive. Upon curtailing cannabis use, many have reported symptoms that have been referred to as "psychological withdrawal", including depression, irritability, lack of appetite, a general feeling of disinterest, and a struggle to enjoy things that were once highly enjoyable for the individual. However, it is important to understand that "psychological addiction" is in no way limited to drugs; any obsessive behavior can be considered an addiction. In this light it is very easy to interpret heartbreak as acute psychological withdrawal.
Cannabis shouldn't be capitalized unless it's at the beginning of a sentence because it's not a proper noun. Cannabis does need to be capitalized when using its proper taxonomic names, Cannabis sativa, Cannabis indica or Cannabis ruderalis.
No it is not cosidered an addictive substance. It can be craved but not to be mistaken and taken to the level of addiction