me
Diocletian
The Emperors Justinian and Basil II
It was to expensive to restore the old Roman Empire
It varied. The Byzantine emperors reigned for life. Some of the emperors reigned for along time, while others died shorty after their accession to power. The length of the reign of emperors also depended on the political stability of he empire. The empire went thought periods of instability which was usurper emperors and/or civil wars. In such periods power changed hands quickly.
Both emperors improved the Byzantine legal system by organizing laws more clearly.
Justinian I, Leo III, John I Tzimisces, Basil II, Manuel I
They were very strong & had some good emperors. They are the continuation of Rome.
Well considering that he was the Byzantine emperor (the eastern Roman Empire was called the Byzantine Empire and did not fall when the western one did), I'd say many. He actually was more like Roman emperors then his Byzantine predecessors and attempted to restore the old borders of the empire.
No one ruled Europe in its entirety. The Roman Empire was the largest country in Europe before the Middle Ages, and it was ruled by its emperors. There is a link below to a list of the Roman Emperors, and those who were emperors before 476 AD were emperors before the Middle Ages began.
The successors were usually the sons of the emperors or a memeber of the his family and this empire had a number of dynsaties
what was one of the major differences between the powers of the emperors in the east and the west
Both emperors expanded the boundaries of the empire by conquering regions along the Mediterranean Sea. -Apex- :)