Nuclear DNA measurements would be considered the most authoritative these days.
They are not THAT closely related; bats are mammals, not birds. Both mammals and birds are vertebrate animals.
There is good evidence that they do. Proteins from the T. rex, the oldest sequences ever reported, were similar to chicken collagen, adding to the mountain of evidence that dinosaurs are most closely related to birds.
The relationship between a humans pregnancy length and average life span is not so different than other mammals. It appears to be closely related to size.
Organisms that are close geographically are usually more closely related than those that evolved in widely separated areas of the world.
Snakes and worms are not closely related. Worms are fairly primitive invertebrates, while snakes are vertebrates with backbones and ribs, a brain, and well-developed circulatory system, among other things. Physically, they are more closely related to birds than to worms.
If 2020 ( DNA ) There is no direct evidence of evolution. Through all the years men and women have been researching and studying. The only thing they have come up with is pure theory. That's the truth.
The kinds of evidence that indicates how closely species are related are evidence of DNA and protein structure.
Similarities in anatomy, biochemistry, and DNA might suggest a relationship. As it turns out birds and insects have no such similarities aside from characteristics common to all animals. Therefore they are not closely related.
rachel
Phoenician.
the role in which molecular evidence play in determining how closely two species are related to each other is through the cladogram
They are not THAT closely related; bats are mammals, not birds. Both mammals and birds are vertebrate animals.
the role in which molecular evidence play in determining how closely two species are related to each other is through the cladogram
Phoenician.
They were closely connected
They were closely connected
mutualism