Since hydropower involves the direct change of stored potential kinetic energy into electricity, rather than requiring going through a thermal transfer stage (i.e. heat->kinetic->electric vs kinetic->electric) as in nuclear or geothermal, the "efficiency" of a hydropower plant is certainly higher than a nuclear or geothermal plant.
In terms of energy produced per unit of input source (i.e. fuel - water in the case of hydro, steam in the case of geothermal, and fissionable fuel in the case of nuclear), nuclear wins by a massive margin (on the order of millions of times more efficient).
Hydro electric ,thermal and nuclear energy
Nuclear, Thermal, Hydro, Windmill.
There are: Hydro electric, Nuclear, Solar, Wind, and Fossil fuels, Geo- thermal and Biofuels.Hydro electric has two categories : Tidal and Wave
it is thermal
hydro electricity is an efficient source of energy 1. pollution free 2. renewable 3. no worries of exhaustion of natural resources
Thermal power plant,Hydro power plant,Nuclear power plant,Diesel power plant.
you are
Generating Energy through Coal i.e, Thermal Energy is costlier as comparer t Hydro energy generation.BUt the Installation cost in case of Hydro Power Plant is much higher than the thermal Pwr Plant
Major source of electricity in Pakistan is hydro. Hydro electricity is generated by 5 major dams of the country. Other means of electricity generation include thermal and atomic.
The answer to the question is both yes and no. The recent nuclear plant disaster at Japan highlights the lack of safety even in a highly developed country. The Chernobil disaster at Russia is still vivid in our mind. With absence of adequate safety measures, radiation leakage from a nuclear plant may cause havoc to the vast populace. On the other hand, nuclear energy is the most pollution free and unending source of energy, when thermal power source from coal is going to exhaust fast. From cost consideration, nuclear energy though it may seem costly, will ultimately prove to be cost friendly and beneficial to mankind in the long run, in comparison to thermal and hydro power energy.
As of 2008 India gets: 63% from Thermal Power (53% Coal, 1% Oil based and 10% gas), 25% from Hydro Power 3% from Nuclear 9% from Renewable India is hard at work to extend its natural gas infrastructure, so I would expect today that gas based thermal might be higher.
It is very efficient. I think...