The President makes the US Supreme Court nominations, so he (or she) is unlikely to reject his (or her) own nominee. Sometimes the President will withdraw a candidate from consideration after meeting resistance from members of the Senate, but this shouldn't be considered rejection on the President's part.
The primary factors in past Senate rejections have been caused by concerns about nominees' extreme social or political ideologies, particularly if the Senate is controlled by a party other than the President's, and/or a deliberate attempt to thwart the choices of an unpopular President. The opposing party is more likely to resist confirming a lame duck President's nominee, hoping a member of their own party will have an opportunity fill the seat after the next election.
Typically, the most important factor is whether the opposing party to the President believes the nominee is an ideological extremist. The second most important factor is whether the candidate is believed to be qualified.
Yes, but not quite. If a vacancy occurs in the Supreme Court, the president nominates a replacement. However, the US Senate must confirm the president's nominee and this confirmation is not automatic - a large number of nominations have been rejected through the years.
Yes, but not quite. If a vacancy occurs in the Supreme Court, the president nominates a replacement. However, the US Senate must confirm the president's nominee and this confirmation is not automatic - a large number of nominations have been rejected through the years.
Senate. The Senate must give a majority vote to approve a Supreme Court nominee.
John Rutledge was the first Presidential nominee for Chief Justice to be rejected by the Senate. President Washington made Rutledge Chief Justice as a "recess appointment" on July 1, 1795; his appointment was officially rejected by a Senate vote of 10-14 on December 15, 1795.For more information, see Related Questions, below.
John Tower Former Senator John Tower was rejected as Bush's nominee for defense secretary.
Supreme Court justices in the United States are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate. The President typically selects a nominee based on their legal qualifications, ideology, and potential impact on the court. After nomination, the Senate Judiciary Committee holds confirmation hearings to evaluate the nominee's qualifications and vote on whether to recommend them to the full Senate. If confirmed by a majority vote in the Senate, the nominee becomes a Supreme Court justice.
The President, but he (or she) must have the consent of the Senate, which votes whether to accept or reject the nominee. If a simple majority (51% of those voting) affirms the President's choice, the nominee is appointed and becomes a US Supreme Court justice
They may have some feedback or thoughts for the president, but they have no say in the matter whatsoever. The president and the president alone nominates people for vacant supreme court seats, and then the senate approves or rejects the nominee.
To become a Supreme Court justice in the United States, an individual must be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The president typically selects a nominee based on their qualifications and ideological alignment. This process provides an avenue for both men and women to be considered for a seat on the Supreme Court.
The president (executive branch) nominates judges to the Supreme Court. If the Congress approves the nomination, the nominee becomes a member of the Supreme Court. So, the Supreme Court depends on the executive for its members.
the president appoints them and the congress questions them
Buchanan successfully appointed only one Supreme Court Justice - Nathan Clifford of Maine in 1858. He also appointed Jeremiah S Black of Pennsylvania in 1861, but this nominee was rejected by one vote (26-25) the Senate, due to the departure of southern Democrats following the secession of their states.