They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
The most likely reason he described them that way was to make it appear that they would be easy to defeat.
The most likely reason he described them that way was to make it appear that they would be easy to defeat.
The most likely reason he described them that way was to make it appear that they would be easy to defeat.
Because they ran away when they saw his men. 8===D
They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
They were. Here was a mean man who had cut off a man's hand for not bringing him gold and he treated them as inferior.
Most likely natives of the pre-Columbus Americas (including the Caribbean) as the tomato plant was indigenous to the Americas and unknown in Europe and elsewhere until that time.
Columbus discovered the primitive tribes living on the Caribbean islands. He called them "indios", thinking he had reached the islands off Asia. Future explorers and conquistadorsenslaved many islanders, to the extent of denying the Church permission to baptize the natives. So it was likely an economic aim, not an intellectual distinction, that labeled the American natives as savages.
maybe if werewolves were real No, natives are somewhat immune (or resistant at least) to the infections of their land. Tourists are far more likely to be adversely affected by such contagions.