Want this question answered?
a knights armour basically represents the rainbow serpent and black abo`s from down unda. No wonder the knights were so weak and their armour beared no protection! because the armour was``crafted" by inexperienced noongars.
they wore good armour
The knights squire would help him get on his armour and mount his horse, the Squire was also expected to go in aid of his Knight if he fell of his horse or was wounded in battle.
For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".For ordinary clothing the Roman soldier wore his military tunic (a tunic that was shorter than the standard civilian tunic) his soldiers' belt and his military boots. He also had a military cloak or "sagum".
I've heard of UN peacekeeping troops referred to as 'knights in white armour' due to the colour of their vehicles. Not sure if this has any relevance.
tabard
a knights armour basically represents the rainbow serpent and black abo`s from down unda. No wonder the knights were so weak and their armour beared no protection! because the armour was``crafted" by inexperienced noongars.
yes knights in armour are connected to form and function. Form: If the armour did not work then the knights would not of used it. Function: And the function is to protect you from a sword.
i
~ It took a knight about 30 minutes to get dissed into their full armour for jousting. ~ Knights met at about 60mph when jousting on horses. ~ Their armour weighed 20kg. ~ They had spiral stairs so that it was hard for the knights to get up in heavy armour and a heavy sword and shield whist fighting. ~ loldogs, ~ ;)
It was manufactured by blacksmiths and armourers and bought from them
Earlier knights wore chain mail. Later knights started using plate armour and shields.
they wore good armour
They wear shiny armour.
No. They wore a Bronze cuirass, greaves, and helmet. As well as a tunic under their armour.
heavy armorIn medieval times, knights wore armour when going in to battle.
Medieval knights wore armor made of metal plates, chainmail, and leather to protect themselves in battle. They also adorned themselves with helmets, shields, and cloaks to further protect themselves and display their status. Additionally, knights wore tunics and surcoats with their coat of arms displayed to identify themselves on the battlefield.