Mostly the evidence is of pottery or artifacts that humans used before they got buried. It may also be skeletons of humans or animals who lived a long time ago!
t
As in the case with his father, David, modern archaeology simply has no evidence for Solomon's empire or any of his supposed architectural undertakings.
The branch of anthropology that deals with the scientific study of the remains of past human cultures is known as archaeology. Archaeologists use physical evidence such as artifacts, structures, and biofacts to reconstruct and understand past human behavior and societies.
There are probably thousands. Most archaeologists specialize in one geographic area or one time period, often both! An archaeologist may also specialize in a particular aspect such as flora or fauna, architecture, ceramics or lithics. There is no end to the possibilities. Some of them are listed below including some theoretical approaches. Archaeoastronomy, Behavioural archaeology, Biblical archaeology, Bioarchaeolgy, Classical archaeology, Cognitive archaeology, Commercial archaeology, Egyptian archaeology, Environmental archaeology, Ethnoarchaeology, Evolutionary archaeology, Experimental archaeology, Feminist archaeology, Field archaeology, Forensic archaeology, Gender archaeology, Geoarchaeology, Historical archaeology, Industrial archaeology, Interpretitive archaeology, Landscape archaeology, Maritime archaeology, Marxist archaeology, Mediaeval archaeology, Nationalist archaeology, Nautical archaeology, Neo-Marxist archaeology, New Archaeology, Processual archaeology, Post-Processual archaeolgy, Osteoarchaeology, Settlement archaeology, Social archaeology, Underwater archaeology, Urban archaeology, Zooarchaeology
'Biblical archaeology' differs from mainstream archaeology because basic to biblical archaeology as a discipline and field of study is a strong belief in the historicity of the Bible, whereas mainstream archaeologists try to learn what the artefacts tell them, without reading modern notions back into the record. Adel H Yahya says in 'Archaeology and Nationalism in the Holy Land', published in The Cave of John the Baptist, it is not uncommon for biblical archaeologists to argue that when the evidence from an archaeological excavation does not fit that from the Bible, one may conclude that the archaeological evidence is incomplete or incorrectly interpreted.Archaeology in and around the Holy Land is regularly reported, appearing even in popular magazines from time to time. Biblical archaeology, as a distinct field, produces its own publications but these tend to be of interest to those hoping to find some evidence to support their religious views, and are not generally so widely circulated.
Archaeology plays a crucial role in reconstructing the history of Great Zimbabwe by providing tangible evidence of past civilizations, including artifacts, structures, and cultural practices. However, archaeology must be used in conjunction with historical documents and oral traditions to create a more comprehensive understanding of the site's history. Combining multiple sources of evidence allows researchers to construct a more accurate interpretation of Great Zimbabwe's past.
Maritime archaeology is archaeology conductred under water.
Some easy disadvantages of archaeology include the potential for destruction of archaeological sites during excavation, the costs associated with conducting fieldwork and analysis, and the time-consuming nature of conducting research and obtaining permits for excavation.
The 5 W's of archaeology are who, what, where, when, and why. These elements help archaeologists understand and interpret past human cultures and societies through the study of artifacts, sites, and other evidence. By addressing these questions, archaeologists can piece together a clearer picture of the past.
It's evidence where sufficient background is required to understand the laws of nature.
Science in archaeology relies on systematic methodologies, empirical evidence, and rigorous testing to understand past human behaviors and societies. In contrast, pseudoscience often lacks scientific validation and may rely on anecdotal evidence, leading to speculative or unfounded claims. This distinction is crucial because pseudoscientific interpretations can mislead public understanding and diminish the credibility of genuine archaeological research. Thus, maintaining scientific rigor ensures that archaeology contributes accurately to our knowledge of history.
Archaeology is the study of the past, especially relating to human kind.