0
What is a potential problem of a direct democracy or majority rule?
Wiki User
∙ 9y ago
tyranny through suppression of the minority
Wiki User
∙ 14y ago
Add your answer:
Earn +20 pts
What are pros and cons of direct democracy?
Pros of direct democracy include increased citizen participation, more direct representation, and potential for greater accountability of government officials. However, cons can include the risk of majority tyranny, potential for uninformed decision-making, and inefficiency in decision-making due to the need to involve all citizens in the process.
What type of democracy does a few representatives are elected to vote for the majority?
direct
What are bad things about a direct democracy?
In a direct democracy, there is a risk of majority tyranny where the rights of minorities may be disregarded. Direct democracies can also be slow and inefficient in decision-making due to the need for constant public input and participation. Additionally, citizens may lack the expertise or time to make informed decisions on complex issues, leading to potential policy mistakes.
What was NOT a reason why the Framers opposed direct democracy?
Framers opposed a direct democracy for many reasons. The most important reason is because they were afraid of the rule of a majority.
What book explains direct democracy?
One book that explains direct democracy is "Direct Democracy: Collective Power, the Swarm, and the State" by Yves Sintomer. This book explores the concepts and mechanisms of direct democracy, how it operates in different contexts, and its potential benefits and challenges. It also discusses case studies from various countries where direct democracy is practiced.
Who urged direct democracy?
James Madison, in Federalist No. 10 advocates a constitutional republic over direct democracy precisely to protect the individual from the will of the majority.
What is a direct democracy about?
Direct democracy allows citizens to make policy decisions through a majority vote. In contrast, representative democracies allow citizens to elect representatives to make policy decisions for them.
Was ancient Greece a direct or representative democracy?
First of all, we should note that only Athens and a few other city-states were ever democracies. The vast majority of Ancient Greece was ruled by monarchies or oligarchies and not by elections. However, in Athenian democracy, all of the citizens voted on policies, which made Athens a direct democracy.
What are the differences between a direct democracy and a republic?
A republic is a representative democracy, where the people elect representatives to make laws for them. A republic makes decisions democratically by the majority vote of representatives.In a representative democracy you elect a few to represent you in the decision making, and make decisions for you, rather then you yourself vote on every decision.(The United States is a republic, or representational democracy, because the people vote for representatives to represent their views in congress. James Madison defined republic in terms of representative democracy as opposed to direct democracy.)A direct democracy, or pure democracy, is where the people rule directly, voting on every law themselves. It's a form of government ruled by majority of every individual. A direct democracy allows all citizens to vote on every decision.Direct democracy is where citizens vote directly by ballot to make decisions for the government. Direct democracy originated in Athens.
What is one beneifit in a direct democracy?
The only benefit of it is that the majority always rules. The problem with that system is that if a would be tyrant were able to convince the majority of something he would then rule based solely on a popular vote. That is why we in the United States have a democratic form of government but are actually a republic.
What problems might result from a direct democracy?
The more people you have in a direct democracy, the harder it becomes to get them all in the same room at the same time to find out how they all vote. For large groups, you then get into polling and mail-in ballots, which is very time-consuming and hard to organize, as well as creating opportunities for fraud. And it is harder to involve everybody and keep them informed. You can broadcast a debate on television, but there is no guarantee that everybody who will be voting is watching your debate. It is also true that large groups of people seem inevitably to include large numbers of fools, who are going to vote in an unwise manner. While this is also a problem of representative democracy, it seems to be an even greater problem with direct democracy. The majority may rule, but there is no guarantee that they will do so with any wisdom.
How much power do citizen have in a democracy?
In a direct democracy, such as in Ancient Greece, the citizens have all power, and everything is done by majority rule. The problem with this is that the over-excited mass often overrules the minority's rights. In a representative democracy, or a republic, the people's power is balanced by allowing the representative to fight for their constituency's interests while protecting the minorities.
