The historical society influenced the development of democracy by championing principles such as equality, representation, and the rule of law. By advocating for the rights of individuals and promoting fair governance, the historical society helped shape democratic values and institutions.

To play an active role in selecting government leaders

Protecting minority groups against oppression by a majority (APEX)

It is respected, as leaders are accountable to the people.

Key figures who contributed to South African democracy include Nelson Mandela, who played a significant role in ending apartheid and becoming the country's first black president, as well as Desmond Tutu and F.W. de Klerk, who were instrumental in the transition to democracy. Other important figures include Oliver Tambo, Albertina Sisulu, and Walter Sisulu, who fought against apartheid and advocated for equality and human rights.

In a representative democracy, citizens elect representatives to make decisions on their behalf, while in a direct democracy, citizens participate directly in decision-making processes, such as through voting on laws and policies themselves. Representative democracies often have a system of elected officials who represent the people's interests, compared to direct democracies where citizens have a more immediate role in governance.

This quote is often attributed to French philosopher and economist Alexis de Tocqueville, although there is no definitive evidence that he actually said or wrote these exact words. The sentiment is commonly used to critique government spending and the risks of politicians using public funds to gain favor with voters.

In a democracy, power flows from the people to the government through free and fair elections. Citizens have the ability to vote for their leaders and hold them accountable, ensuring that power remains in the hands of the people. Additionally, the separation of powers and checks and balances system helps to distribute and regulate power among different branches of government.

Merits of democracy include promoting citizen participation, protecting individual rights, and fostering political stability. However, some demerits include potential for populism, slow decision-making processes, and susceptibility to corruption.

Characteristics of advanced democracies include free and fair elections, protection of individual rights and freedoms, rule of law, separation of powers, and a robust civil society. Additionally, they often have a strong economy, high levels of education and healthcare, and low levels of corruption.

In a democracy, power is gained by the people through free and fair elections. Elected officials are chosen by the citizens to represent their interests and make decisions on their behalf. The ultimate authority and control rest with the people, who have the ability to hold their representatives accountable through regular elections.

Voltaire expressed mixed views on democracy. While he criticized absolute monarchy and supported some democratic ideals, he also believed that democracy could lead to mob rule and instability. He often favored a more enlightened despotism as a form of government.

A social democrat might have acknowledged the concerns raised by Marx regarding capitalism and inequality, but would have likely emphasized the need for gradual reforms and regulation within the system rather than advocating for a complete overthrow of capitalism. They would likely argue for policies that address income inequality, social welfare, and workers' rights within a democratic framework.

Americans have political representation in both the House of Representative and the Senate

Voltaire's ideas advocating for freedom of speech, tolerance, and separation of church and state have had a significant influence on modern democratic principles. His work challenging authoritarianism and advocating for individual rights has helped shape modern notions of democracy and human rights. Voltaire's emphasis on reason, scientific inquiry, and individual liberty continues to inspire democratic movements worldwide.

Ghandi does not mean anything, Ghandi is a name, if you want to learn about him then search him up on Google

1. Fragmentation: Multiparty democracy can lead to a fragmented political landscape with numerous parties competing for power. This can result in unstable governments, difficulty forming coalitions, and slow decision-making processes.

2. Polarization: Multiparty democracy can also lead to increased polarization and extremism, as parties may cater to their ideological base in order to differentiate themselves. This can hinder cooperation and compromise among parties, and make it difficult to find common ground on important issues.

3. Representativeness: In multiparty democracies, there is a risk that smaller parties may not have a strong voice or representation in government. This can lead to certain segments of the population feeling marginalized and dissatisfied with the democratic process.

Most democracies outside the US have parliamentary systems, where the executive branch is led by a prime minister who is chosen by the legislature. They also tend to have proportional representation electoral systems, where seats in the legislature are allocated based on the proportion of votes a party receives. Additionally, many democracies outside the US have multi-party systems, allowing for a greater diversity of political parties and views.

The movement toward democracy in many parts of the world should lead to increased political participation, protection of human rights, and greater accountability and transparency in governance. It should also pave the way for more inclusive and representative systems of government that prioritize the needs and aspirations of all citizens. Ultimately, the aim is to foster a culture of democratic values and principles that promotes peace, stability, and socio-economic development.

A limited democracy is a form of government where the power of elected officials is constrained by a constitution or other form of legal framework. In this system, there are limits on the government's authority, and certain individual rights and freedoms are protected. This is in contrast to an absolute democracy, where there are no constraints on the government's power.

Cacique democracy is a term used to describe a system of political power in which local leaders, known as caciques, have significant influence over the political process. These leaders often exert control over the election process and have the ability to manipulate the outcome in their favor. Cacique democracy is typically associated with corruption, clientelism, and the concentration of power in the hands of a few dominant individuals.

Angola is considered to be a presidential republic with a multiparty system. The President of Angola is both the head of state and the head of government, elected by popular vote. However, the political landscape in Angola has been dominated by one party, the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), since independence in 1975, leading to limited political pluralism and competition.

The Aztec civilization had a complex political system that can be described as a stratified society with elements of both monarchy and democracy. At the top of the hierarchy, there was an emperor who held political power and claimed divine authority. However, important decisions were often made through a council of nobles and advisors, and there were also mechanisms for commoners to voice their opinions and participate in decision-making processes.

Town meetings and local assemblies were used as a sort of school of political democracy for the members of the lower orders in the colonies-turned-states. These meetings provided opportunities for citizens to participate in the decision-making process and learn about political issues. By attending these meetings and engaging in discussions and debates, individuals in the lower orders could gain knowledge and experience with democratic practices.