The word 'at' is not a verb and so doesn't have a past tense.
Ate IS the past tense, of eat.
Destroyed is the past tense of destroy...therefore there is not a past tense for destroyed.
The past tense is smote.
"Responsible" is an adjective. It does not have a past tense. Instead, the past tense would apply to the word before. (Present - she is responsible, Past - she was responsible.)
No. Angry is an adjective and does not have a past tense.
The past tense of clean is cleaned.
Ate is the past tense of the word eat. Its a past tense word
Yes, the past tense of "eat" is "ate."
Eaten is the past participle of "eat" The simple past tense is "ate"
Eaten is the past participle of eat, not the past tense. Ate is the past tense.
"Ate" is the past tense; "eaten" is the past participle.
Yes, it is the past tense of eat.
No. Eat is present tense, ate is past tense, and eaten is the past participle.
The past tense is ate.(Be careful - eat is an irregular verb which means the past participle is different. The past participle is eaten)The present tense is:I/You/We/They eat.He/She/It eats.The present participle is eating.The future tense is will eat.
The past tense for eat is ate.
The past tense of "eat" would be "ate". "Eaten" could be used as a past tense, too.
eat is present tense. We eat rice everyday Ate is past tense. We ate rice yesterday
The past tense of "eat" is "ate".