Rang, or rung.
Yes, in the sense of 'to put a ring round' and related meanings. 'The naturalist ringed the duck before returning it to the water.' 'The woodcutter ringed the trees that she was going to cut down the following day.'
No: to ring, rang, rung. The Past Tense is RANG. RINGED is an adjective formed as a Participle = something with rings.
The past tense form of the word 'ring' is 'rang'. "The teacher rang the bell."The past tense of "ring" can also be "ringed" since the verb "ring" can be used to mean "to form or provide a circle" or "to surround"."The police ringed the building.""The blue-ringed octopus has a poisonous bite."
Yes, if you are referring to the verb ring in the respect that you are creating a ring around something (e.g. She ringed his neck). Otherwise (and more commonly), rang is the correct answer.
the past tense of am is was and the past tense of has is had
The past tense of "has" is "had" and the past tense of "have" is "had."
Was and were are both the past tense of be. The present tense is: I am he is you are they are The past tense is: I was he was you were they were
"will be" is the future tense of "be". The past tense of "be" is "was/were".
The past tense is she did.
rang
The word "were" is past tense. It is the past tense of the verb "to be."
The past tense of "will" is "would". The past tense of "to be" is "was" or "were".