If you mean how an individual decision is made by a juror, it is called "A preponderance of the evidence", which means they are more than 50% sure.
If you mean when the opposing sides make an agreement, it is called a settlement.
If you mean the final decision, it is called a judgment.
Hope this helps!
dont know
dont know
In civil cases, a verdict may be reached by a majority of nine of the twelve members.
The Supreme Court decision for Scott vs. Sandford set the stage for the Civil War by mobilizing he abolitionist movement. They made the decision on the case in 1857.
If a judge has not made a decision, the plaintiff and their attorney can drop, or settle, the tort. However, once a judge has made a decision, the judge's decision is upheld by law, and the plaintiff has no say.
Unknown/unclear what is meant by the phrase "struck out." If you believe you have a valid case for a civil suit for damages, contact an attorney for consultation.
False
When dealing with the courts, the term interpretation is very important. When a case is presented to the court and the jury, their final decision will be determined by how they interpreted the case and the events that when on. For example, in a case of civil theft when the accused states their defense, the court will decide what happened by the story told. Their decision being their interpretation.
The phrase 'command decision' means that something has been decided by the head of the organization. It came from military lingo.
The prepositional phrase is "during the Civil War."
The case was closed. someone didn't show up to support their claim or didn't answer the claim against them.
Yes it can. But as far as it being a slam dunk for the same judgment to be issued, no. Whoever is doing the suing can only use the decision to support their position and maybe buttress their position to influence the decision handed there in the civil court.