There is no plural form for mankind. The noun mankind is an uncountable (mass) noun, a word for all humans considered as a single group, a word for a concept.
No, the noun mankind is an uncountable (mass) noun, a word for all humans considered as a single group, a word for a concept.
No. Man's is singular possessive. Men's is plural possessive.The man's legs are hairy. (Means one man's legs are hairy.)The men's legs are hairy. (Means that more than one man's legs are hairy.)Even if you used man for mankind, mankind would be singular.
One can get this information about mankind from the following sources: Mankind, Mankind Grooming, Wikipedia, Mankind Pharma, Mankind BMX, Mankind Project.
If by 'Man' you mean to imply 'all of mankind', a collective noun:* yes, man's can be considered a plural possessive. e.g. 'Man's inhumanity to man.' But if you mean several men, i.e the plural of man, an adult hiuman male, then* no, the correct possessive form would be men's. e.g. 'Where is the men's room?'
No, the form "man" is a singular noun. The plural form is men.Examples:A man got on the bus at Fourth Street.Two more men got on at Sixth Street.
Having human form or attributes as opposed to those of animals or divine beings. Dictionary definition.
mankind is an amazing worth of this world. without mankind where would we be?
an orchid mantis does or does not help mankind. which means that it doesn't help mankind but its not bad for mankind either
When used with the article (a man) man is singular, referring to a single male human e.g. a man walked into a bar. When we want to talk about two or more male humans we use the plural 'men' e.g. two men walked into a bar. However, man without the article is a synonym of mankind. They basically mean the same thing e.g. if a large asteroid were to hit Earth, man/mankind would be wiped out.
mankind
entertainig mankind
Mankind is another way of saying human. Mankind is in the animal kingdom. One small step for a man; a giant leap for mankind.