"Children's" is already a plural possessive. It means something belongs to many children, e.g. a children's playground.
The singular possessive form is "child's".
Childrens is not the correct word. The plural of child is children with no -S on the end.It is also not an abbreviation so there is no "full form" to give.
Childrens is not the correct word. The plural of child is children with no -S on the end.It is also not an abbreviation so there is no "full form" to give.
The form childrens' is not correct.For irregular plural nouns that do not end with an s, add an apostrophe s ('s) to the end of the word (the same as a singular noun that doesn't end with s).We went to the children's playground.
None are. (see the related questions below)The plural possessive of editor is editors' but it cannot take a possessive in the combined form "editor in chief" -- the plural possessive is editors in chief's.
The plural form "children" is derived from Old English, where "child" had its own unique plural form. Over time, the word "children" became the accepted plural form through language evolution and historical usage, so it is now the standard plural form for "child."
No, the plural form 'children' is an irregular pluralnoun (there is NO 's' at the end of the word).A regular plural noun is a word that is made plural by adding an 's' or an 'es' to the end of the word.An irregular plural is a word that is made plural in some other way.The word 'children' is the plural for for the singular noun 'child'. The plural is formed by adding 'ren' to the end of the word (not 's' or 'es'); a irregular plural form.
You don't use childrens if it is singular use child or kid. If it is plural like i believe it is (refering to more than one kid) use children
There is no plural form. Do and Do not are verbs
The plural form of him, her, or it is them. (objective pronouns)
Bridges is the plural form of bridge.
The plural form of "is" is "are."
The plural form of "I" is "we."