he would is a pronoun + an auxiliary verb. As a verb cannot have case, you cannot make this phrase possessive. *his would is nonsensical. The closest you could get to a "possessive" is to find the noun root of would which is will. You could say his will. But its hardly the possessive equivalent
No, it is singular, the possessive form of it is its. The plural form of it is they or them, and the possessive form is their.To answer the question directly: there is no such word as ITS'.
The singular possessive form is evening's. The plural possessive form is evenings'.
The plural possessive form is audiences'.
Nieces' is the plural possessive form of the noun niece. The singular possessive form would be niece's.
The possessive form would be past-ghost's.
The possessive form for the 'recipe of the chef' is the chef's recipe.
No, he is not possessive. The possessive form would be his.
That would be watches.
The possessive form of the singular noun colony is colony's.
The word messenger's is the possessive form for the noun messenger, for example the messenger's bicycle. The plural possessive form is messengers'.
The possessive form is the lions' roar.
Him is not possessive. The possessive would be 'his'.